> > "Cottonmouth" <noway[ at ]nohow.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9B6761F4E1561myemailemalecom[ at ]216.77.188.18...
> >> I just upgraded to XP from 98SE and need a little advice. The
> >> upgrade included SP2 and Windows wants me to add the SP3 patch. So
> >> far I haven't and I've heard conflicting stories about SP3. Should
> >> I keep refusing permission for the update? I'm not really happy
> >> with this damn thing calling home all the time,anyway. Is there any
> >> way to put a stop to that?
> >>
> >> I'll start monitoring this newsgroup on a regular basis and maybe
> >> learn something before I make any major errors, myself.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> >
> > Yes I'd go for SP3
> >
> > In addition to the latest security updates...It actually improves
> > performance.
>
> Yes, go for SP3 but be CERTAIN, as with all service packs, to visit the
> MS web site and read the requirements for a smooth installation. There
> ARE a few instances where there could be problems and they are detailed
> there. There are a couple computer brand names in particular that have
> problems so if you have one of those you'll want the work-arounds
> provided on the site.
> If for no other reason, SP3 negates the need for about a hundred
> updates when you're using SP2.
> You're not very likely to see performance improvements unless you
> have one of the few specific applications they mention for the service
> pact or your SP2 setup is having a problem to begin with. Other than
> those few specific application-specific enhancements, SP3 is basically
> SP2 with all of its following updates up to SP3. It's pretty well
> explained on the site:
>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950717>
> HTH
>
> Twayne
>
>
>