>
> "Barry Schwarz" <schwarzb[ at ]dqel.com> wrote in message
> news:66s5j4hn6i69h1ggujq80oq17f6sthqqko[ at ]4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:47:15 -0600, "oh well" <ohwell61238[ at ]yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Twayne" <nobody[ at ]devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message
>>>news:O2zGETvUJHA.5084[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Does that mean you're telling me I should subscribe to
>>>>> microsoft.public.windowsxp.general just to get your answer.
>>>>
>>>> He's t elling you that you also posted there, separately, in addition
>>>> to
>>>> here. So if you want to see the answers to what you posted there,
>>>> you'll
>>>> have to go there. Had you crossposted, you'd have seen all answers
>>>> here
>>>> and ther both, until you read them, and they they'd be marked read here
>>>> and there.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> How to Post to more than one group:
>>>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossposting>>>
>>>Way wrong, I didn't post anything. I am subscribed to this newsgroup. I
>>>read HIS post, would like to know the answer to HIS question because I
>>>was
>>>interested.
>>>
>>
>> So either your read it there or someone else has to post it here just
>> for you. If you won't make the supremely difficult effort of either
>> subscribing or searching google, you may have a long wait.
>>
>> --
>> Remove del for email
>> ** Posted from
http://www.teranews.com **
>
> Well I read it here, I did NOT read it there. No one else even knows I'm
> subscribed to this group and I don't know anyone else in this group so I
> don't really believe anyone did me that favor. If a question is posted
> here it seems like it would be a common courtesy to answer it here but I
> know that to answer the question where it is posted must be a supremely
> difficult task for you.
>
> oh well......
>