User Name wrote:
[Quoted Text] > We are short of IP addresses. So, when a laptop if off the network > for more than a couple of days, there is a good chance the unused IP > will be automatically reassigned via DHCP to another machine. There > is quite a bit of IP address turnover in 7 days. Does this mean we > should set scavenging period to shorter than the default 7 days if we > were to enable scavenging? > > There is a single DHCP server, but 2 DNS servers. > Would it be a good idea to turn off the option of DHCP clients > registering themselves into DNS and letting the DHCP server > exclusively handle the DNS registrations? Wouldn't that eliminate the > source of duplicate entries into DNS and thus eliminate the need of > scavenging after the fact? > > I think duplicate entries are also occuring when laptops are carried > to different floors and meeting rooms where they may be assigned new > IP addresses in different subnets as it moves around the building even > within the same day. Will scavenging do anything about these > duplicate entries?
I am not that up on scavenging as I am learning it too.
I found that article about a day before I read your post and figured I would pass it on.
What is your lease time on the DHCP assigned IP addresses?
I believe you could shorten the lease time so they can be added back to the pool sooner.
As for the scavenging, I would want the DNS record removed when the lease expires, so you may want to correpsond the times in according to the DHCP lease time.
Take this information lightly as I am working on this same issue too except that most of IP addresses are static and on one subnet.
Hopefully others here can correct me if I am mistaken.
moncho
|