Werbung: SecurityConsole.de verwaltet Ihre Computer mit Security Essentails aus der Cloud!
30 Tage kostenfrei testen und 20% Rabatt für Ihre Bestellung mit Promocode: WBF2685582
(Promocode gültig bis 31.12.2011)

Group:  English: Windows Server » microsoft.public.windows.server.dns
Thread: About a reverse delegation for a subnetted zone

HTVi
TV Discussion Newsgroups

About a reverse delegation for a subnetted zone
<inputio.com> 11/20/2008 3:10:33 PM
Hi guys,

i need to delegate a reverse zone for my Microsoft Dns Server W2K3 to
another external dns server.

The problem is that i would delegate only a part of this zone (my subnet is
192.168.10.1 - 255.255.255.128) so if a client query for example ip :
192.168.0.10 the resolution is demand to external dns otherwise if a client
query for ip 192.168.0.201 my MS DNS Server resolve the request.

I try to delagate a complete zone and all work fine but how i can delagate
only a part (subnet) of this ? Microsoft DNS can make it ?

Thanks in advance.

Re: About a reverse delegation for a subnetted zone
"A, Deji" <deji[ at ]akomolafe.com> 11/24/2008 10:04:33 PM
You want to delegate a reverse zone, or you want to reverse-delegate a range
of IPs?

I tried to understand what you are asking, but I am not very sure that I
understand it. You do know that clients query DNS for a "name" resolution,
right? They have a name (not IP) and they ask the DNS server to go look for
the IP for that "name". The way I'm reading what you wrote, it looks like
you want client to go to a particular DNS server IF they are looking for a
particular "IP address". If I am mistaken, could you try and rephrase your
question? I realize that English may not be your primary language, so please
don't think that I am insulting you.

Deji

<inputio.com> wrote in message news:u6yjjIySJHA.4504[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
[Quoted Text]
> Hi guys,
>
> i need to delegate a reverse zone for my Microsoft Dns Server W2K3 to
> another external dns server.
>
> The problem is that i would delegate only a part of this zone (my subnet
> is 192.168.10.1 - 255.255.255.128) so if a client query for example ip :
> 192.168.0.10 the resolution is demand to external dns otherwise if a
> client query for ip 192.168.0.201 my MS DNS Server resolve the request.
>
> I try to delagate a complete zone and all work fine but how i can
> delagate only a part (subnet) of this ? Microsoft DNS can make it ?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>

Re: About a reverse delegation for a subnetted zone
Andrew Hodgson <me3[ at ]privacy.net> 11/27/2008 9:40:57 PM
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:10:33 +0100, <inputio.com> wrote:

[Quoted Text]
>Hi guys,
>
>i need to delegate a reverse zone for my Microsoft Dns Server W2K3 to
>another external dns server.
>
>The problem is that i would delegate only a part of this zone (my subnet is
>192.168.10.1 - 255.255.255.128) so if a client query for example ip :
>192.168.0.10 the resolution is demand to external dns otherwise if a client
>query for ip 192.168.0.201 my MS DNS Server resolve the request.
>
>I try to delagate a complete zone and all work fine but how i can delagate
>only a part (subnet) of this ? Microsoft DNS can make it ?

The way I have done this before (on a complex network with loads of
/28s is to create a parent zone on the upstream DNS, then create NS
records pointing at the relevant DNS servers on the subnets.

For example:

Create the zone 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa (192.168.1.x), we then have two
subnets so far, a /30 subnet and a /28 subnet.

0.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. CNAME 0.0-3.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
1.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. CNAME 1.0-3.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
2.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. CNAME 2.0-3.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
3.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. CNAME 3.0-3.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
4.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. CNAME 4.4-19.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa

Create the NS records.

0-3.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. ns ns1.30site.com.
4-19.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. ns ns1.28site.com.

Then on the relevant nameservers create the zones:
0-3.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa, for examples, and add the relevant
records.

In our case the DNS servers on the private networks were forwarding to
the master DNS servers, which had all the routes to the other DNS
servers for the rest of the IP space, so the users could resolve the
PTR records correctly.

The only issue we had with this was that some clients did not register
the PTR records when doing dynamic updates, however, this only seemed
to be a few clients.

You could also look at the possability of using selective forwarding
to do this, though this would need fleshing out.

Thanks.
Andrew.

Home | Search | Terms | Imprint Contact
Newsgroups Reader - provided by WiredBox.Net
Suche nach Orten, Städten, Postleitzahlen, Vorwahlen, Kfz-Kennzeichen