> "Mike Morris" <MikeMorris[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:C854A477-313A-44CE-AA1B-DBDE00730067[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > Thank you, Lawrence, for your response. Yes, I did see the information
> > you
> > reference, but I hoped that there was newer guidance and support for WSUS
> > 3.0
> > SP1 USING SQL Server 2008 now that it is released.
>
> No, there isn't. As you might expect, since the build date of WSUS 3.0 SP1
> precedes the Release Date of SQL Server 2005, there's no practical way that
> the WSUS 3.0 SP1 build could have any awareness of a product not yet in
> production.
>
> > Sadly, it seems that only
> > SCVMM 2008 (not SCOM 2007 SP1, SCCM 2007 R2, or WSUS 3.0 SP1) currently
> > supports the USE of SQL Server 2008.
>
> SCVMM 2008 has a build date after the GA of SQL Server 2008, thus the
> ability to build SCVMM 2008 to the specs of production level code.
>
> Now, having said all of that... since, apparently, you real question was
> about the ability to use SQL Server 2008,
> let's talk about the basic ability of SQL Server 2008 to host SQL Server
> 2005 databases,
> just like SQL Server 2005 was able to host SQL Server 2000 databases,
> just like SQL Server 2000 was able to host SQL Server 7 databases,
> just like SQL Server 7 was able to host SQL Server 6.5 databases....
>
> see my point? :-)
>
> Since the dawn of time SQL Server has supported "backward compatibility" of
> databases in the newer environment.
>
> Currently, I do not know of any reason why WSUS 3.0 SP1 will not work on a
> SQL Server 2008 database server.
>
>
> --
> Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP
> Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
> Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
>
> MS WSUS Website:
http://www.microsoft.com/wsus> My Websites:
http://www.onsitechsolutions.com;>
http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com> My MVP Profile:
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Lawrence.Garvin>
>