Thats what I was affraid of. Is there a way to get the client to use the
second if there is a timeout or noname resolution?
"Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)[ at ]gmx.de> wrote in message
news:ff16fb66ca938cb0a8aa320c149[ at ]msnews.microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > Hello Readr, > > If you have multiple DNS servers the clients use the preferred set on the > NIC first. So if this is reachable they will not use another DNS server. > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > confers no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm> >> I am looking for a paper or diagram on how dns works at the transport >> layer. >> I had a situation where one site had a failed connection and a dns >> server >> that couldnt resolve names >> as it couldnt reach its forwarders therefore had no recursion. there >> was a >> second connection >> with another dns server which was able to resolve ip request. Because >> the >> 1st dns was up the clients all sent it the >> requests and it returned a timeout. what would be the best method to >> have >> the clients get dns from the 2nd dns server even if the 1st is up. >> I know >> it sounds odd, but its the best I can explain this situation >> Fedo >> > >
|