Considering how seldom one has a hard drive failure, and how difficult it is to actually destroy data from a hard drive, I would sooner backup essential data to a data only hard drive (whether internal or external) as opposed to a fragile DVD. -- Art (artfudd) Folden --------------------- "StephenB" <sboots[ at ]mvps.org> wrote in message news:4kfe93d3dcsnb7vh8o5a09lg75s1t2rsl8[ at ]4ax.com...
[Quoted Text] > "artfudd" <notreal[ at ]noplace.nil> wrote: > >>t seems strange that their thinking is that to backup to an internal drive >>is dangerous, but to backup to an external drive is safe. I think they >>need >>to differentiate between a separate (from the OS) internal hard drive from >>the drive the OS resides. I can see not wanting to backup to a partition >>on >>the hard drive that also has the OS partition, but see no reason to not >>allow backup to a different internal hard drive. If something can happen >>to >>the internal drive then something is even more apt to happen to an >>external >>drive. Is their thinking a little haywire.... or is mine? :) >>-- >>Art (artfudd) > Actually, they originally designed backup to *only* work with CD/DVD. > External > disks was added for 1.0 and Network drives were added for 1.5. > :-) > -steve > -- > Stephen Boots sboots[ at ]mvps.org > Microsoft MVP - Windows Live > Windows Live OneCare Forum Moderator > http://forums.microsoft.com/windowsonecare/default.aspx?siteid=2
|