|
|
i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
the issue I face is:
Reply:
Thank you for your help & assistance.
I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
it reads verbatim as follows--
RUNDLL
Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
The specified module can not be found.
I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
Thank U
|
|
As I said before: Whatever the file is it seems you're the
only one in the world reporting this particular problem.
Searches of the internet only come up with your post in
microsoft.public.dotnet.vjsharp. And you have the post in
this forum.
You need to do some investigating on your system and stop
spouting the same thing over and over.
You are the only one on planet earth reporting this problem!!!
You are also posting in the WRONG forum! This is for 64-bit
Windows, not 32-bit!
Mansion wrote:
[Quoted Text] > i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
>
> the issue I face is:
>
> Reply:
> Thank you for your help & assistance.
> I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
> it reads verbatim as follows--
> RUNDLL
> Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
> The specified module can not be found.
>
> I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
> Thank U
|
|
It seems you (or something/someone) are trying to run an incompatible
program. Read further here:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/164787
You could try and run a thorough Virus check - but, like Theo says - thi is
not the right forum.
nntp://microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
might bring you better info.
Tony. . .
"Mansion" <Mansion[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F667E1EC-F041-4AAE-97AC-8A70FB1CB1B7[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
>
> the issue I face is:
>
> Reply:
> Thank you for your help & assistance.
> I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
> it reads verbatim as follows--
> RUNDLL
> Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
> The specified module can not be found.
>
> I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
> Thank U
|
|
Post this same message one more time to screw in a light bulb. :)
"Mansion" <Mansion[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F667E1EC-F041-4AAE-97AC-8A70FB1CB1B7[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] >i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
>
> the issue I face is:
>
> Reply:
> Thank you for your help & assistance.
> I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
> it reads verbatim as follows--
> RUNDLL
> Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
> The specified module can not be found.
>
> I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
> Thank U
|
|
How about searching your registry for ajaxcjsg.dll ocurrences and delete the
entry trying to load it on startup?
That would certainly stop that error (do the registry thing at your own
risk!!!. Back it up first!!!) and your posts here. :)
Did you always have this error?
Did it show up a few days ago?
Can you do a system restore to a previous known good state?
What have you installed recently that might have triggered this problem?
Carlos
"Mansion" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
>
> the issue I face is:
>
> Reply:
> Thank you for your help & assistance.
> I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
> it reads verbatim as follows--
> RUNDLL
> Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
> The specified module can not be found.
>
> I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
> Thank U
|
|
The 'snag', though, seems to be that RUNDLL is not compatible with anything
after ME, later versions is using RUNDLL32 so I assume that anything making
a call to this library doesn't belong on XP in the first place. That leaves
few things to suggest, in any event!
Tony. . .
"Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0E75D87A-98B1-4ACF-8D1D-4A88444205E9[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > How about searching your registry for ajaxcjsg.dll ocurrences and delete
the
> entry trying to load it on startup?
> That would certainly stop that error (do the registry thing at your own
> risk!!!. Back it up first!!!) and your posts here. :)
> Did you always have this error?
> Did it show up a few days ago?
> Can you do a system restore to a previous known good state?
> What have you installed recently that might have triggered this problem?
> Carlos
>
>
> "Mansion" wrote:
>
> > i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
> >
> > the issue I face is:
> >
> > Reply:
> > Thank you for your help & assistance.
> > I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
> > it reads verbatim as follows--
> > RUNDLL
> > Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
> > The specified module can not be found.
> >
> > I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
> > Thank U
|
|
Oh, I didn't notice the 16-bit smell of RUNDLL!!!
Carlos
"Tony Sperling" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > The 'snag', though, seems to be that RUNDLL is not compatible with anything
> after ME, later versions is using RUNDLL32 so I assume that anything making
> a call to this library doesn't belong on XP in the first place. That leaves
> few things to suggest, in any event!
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0E75D87A-98B1-4ACF-8D1D-4A88444205E9[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > How about searching your registry for ajaxcjsg.dll ocurrences and delete
> the
> > entry trying to load it on startup?
> > That would certainly stop that error (do the registry thing at your own
> > risk!!!. Back it up first!!!) and your posts here. :)
> > Did you always have this error?
> > Did it show up a few days ago?
> > Can you do a system restore to a previous known good state?
> > What have you installed recently that might have triggered this problem?
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> > "Mansion" wrote:
> >
> > > i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
> > >
> > > the issue I face is:
> > >
> > > Reply:
> > > Thank you for your help & assistance.
> > > I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
> > > it reads verbatim as follows--
> > > RUNDLL
> > > Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
> > > The specified module can not be found.
> > >
> > > I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
> > > Thank U
>
>
>
|
|
Ha!
But it's not just the smell, it's even worse (and a bit interresting) - XP
should be able to execute 16bit instructions. The Windows System consists of
many file formats, many of which are actually executables. Take the
screensavers as an example. It is probably not generally known that they can
be executed from the command-line. Fire up your favorite shell and write
'SSPIPES.SCR -s' and enjoy!
In the same sense, DLL's are executables (many even have an EXE extension.
Like RUNDLL32.EXE) but they cannot be executed from the command line or by
any other means. They obey a special 'Calling Convention' (Pascal) that is
never used in Windows otherwise, as I remember. This lets you call, and
execute functions inside the file, but the file cannot be executed in it's
entirety.
With XP they made RUNDLL to be 32bit, and then of course you can only call
it's functions via a 32bit application, so if you have an app that is making
calls to RUNDLL, it might be a solution to install RUNDLL - but it also
might not be a good idea. . .I just don't know.
(Sorry, for pontificating.)
Tony. . .
"Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:75DFF289-F38B-4A43-A3C8-3F486EC8FFB0[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > Oh, I didn't notice the 16-bit smell of RUNDLL!!!
> Carlos
>
> "Tony Sperling" wrote:
>
> > The 'snag', though, seems to be that RUNDLL is not compatible with
anything
> > after ME, later versions is using RUNDLL32 so I assume that anything
making
> > a call to this library doesn't belong on XP in the first place. That
leaves
> > few things to suggest, in any event!
> >
> >
> > Tony. . .
> >
|
|
Tony:
Thanks for the tutorial.
I guess I'll have to read it more thoroughly tomorrow.
It is almost 11PM down here and my cell brains are active down to 10%
:)
Carlos
"Tony Sperling" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > Ha!
>
> But it's not just the smell, it's even worse (and a bit interresting) - XP
> should be able to execute 16bit instructions. The Windows System consists of
> many file formats, many of which are actually executables. Take the
> screensavers as an example. It is probably not generally known that they can
> be executed from the command-line. Fire up your favorite shell and write
> 'SSPIPES.SCR -s' and enjoy!
>
> In the same sense, DLL's are executables (many even have an EXE extension.
> Like RUNDLL32.EXE) but they cannot be executed from the command line or by
> any other means. They obey a special 'Calling Convention' (Pascal) that is
> never used in Windows otherwise, as I remember. This lets you call, and
> execute functions inside the file, but the file cannot be executed in it's
> entirety.
>
> With XP they made RUNDLL to be 32bit, and then of course you can only call
> it's functions via a 32bit application, so if you have an app that is making
> calls to RUNDLL, it might be a solution to install RUNDLL - but it also
> might not be a good idea. . .I just don't know.
>
> (Sorry, for pontificating.)
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:75DFF289-F38B-4A43-A3C8-3F486EC8FFB0[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > Oh, I didn't notice the 16-bit smell of RUNDLL!!!
> > Carlos
> >
> > "Tony Sperling" wrote:
> >
> > > The 'snag', though, seems to be that RUNDLL is not compatible with
> anything
> > > after ME, later versions is using RUNDLL32 so I assume that anything
> making
> > > a call to this library doesn't belong on XP in the first place. That
> leaves
> > > few things to suggest, in any event!
> > >
> > >
> > > Tony. . .
> > >
>
>
>
|
|
That's O.K. - It's 04.00 AM here and my cell is buzzing!
(ah - not really)
Tony. . .
"Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C7D1D8CA-10DD-4939-8071-77785C0E810E[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > Tony:
> Thanks for the tutorial.
> I guess I'll have to read it more thoroughly tomorrow.
> It is almost 11PM down here and my cell brains are active down to 10%
> :)
> Carlos
>
> "Tony Sperling" wrote:
>
> > Ha!
> >
> > But it's not just the smell, it's even worse (and a bit interresting) -
XP
> > should be able to execute 16bit instructions. The Windows System
consists of
> > many file formats, many of which are actually executables. Take the
> > screensavers as an example. It is probably not generally known that they
can
> > be executed from the command-line. Fire up your favorite shell and write
> > 'SSPIPES.SCR -s' and enjoy!
> >
> > In the same sense, DLL's are executables (many even have an EXE
extension.
> > Like RUNDLL32.EXE) but they cannot be executed from the command line or
by
> > any other means. They obey a special 'Calling Convention' (Pascal) that
is
> > never used in Windows otherwise, as I remember. This lets you call, and
> > execute functions inside the file, but the file cannot be executed in
it's
> > entirety.
> >
> > With XP they made RUNDLL to be 32bit, and then of course you can only
call
> > it's functions via a 32bit application, so if you have an app that is
making
> > calls to RUNDLL, it might be a solution to install RUNDLL - but it also
> > might not be a good idea. . .I just don't know.
> >
> > (Sorry, for pontificating.)
> >
> >
> > Tony. . .
> >
> >
> > "Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:75DFF289-F38B-4A43-A3C8-3F486EC8FFB0[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > > Oh, I didn't notice the 16-bit smell of RUNDLL!!!
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > > "Tony Sperling" wrote:
> > >
> > > > The 'snag', though, seems to be that RUNDLL is not compatible with
> > anything
> > > > after ME, later versions is using RUNDLL32 so I assume that anything
> > making
> > > > a call to this library doesn't belong on XP in the first place. That
> > leaves
> > > > few things to suggest, in any event!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tony. . .
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
|
|
Wow!
When do you sleep then?
Is your metabolism used to some LatinAmerican timezone?
Carlos
"Tony Sperling" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > That's O.K. - It's 04.00 AM here and my cell is buzzing!
>
> (ah - not really)
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:C7D1D8CA-10DD-4939-8071-77785C0E810E[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > Tony:
> > Thanks for the tutorial.
> > I guess I'll have to read it more thoroughly tomorrow.
> > It is almost 11PM down here and my cell brains are active down to 10%
> > :)
> > Carlos
> >
> > "Tony Sperling" wrote:
> >
> > > Ha!
> > >
> > > But it's not just the smell, it's even worse (and a bit interresting) -
> XP
> > > should be able to execute 16bit instructions. The Windows System
> consists of
> > > many file formats, many of which are actually executables. Take the
> > > screensavers as an example. It is probably not generally known that they
> can
> > > be executed from the command-line. Fire up your favorite shell and write
> > > 'SSPIPES.SCR -s' and enjoy!
> > >
> > > In the same sense, DLL's are executables (many even have an EXE
> extension.
> > > Like RUNDLL32.EXE) but they cannot be executed from the command line or
> by
> > > any other means. They obey a special 'Calling Convention' (Pascal) that
> is
> > > never used in Windows otherwise, as I remember. This lets you call, and
> > > execute functions inside the file, but the file cannot be executed in
> it's
> > > entirety.
> > >
> > > With XP they made RUNDLL to be 32bit, and then of course you can only
> call
> > > it's functions via a 32bit application, so if you have an app that is
> making
> > > calls to RUNDLL, it might be a solution to install RUNDLL - but it also
> > > might not be a good idea. . .I just don't know.
> > >
> > > (Sorry, for pontificating.)
> > >
> > >
> > > Tony. . .
> > >
> > >
> > > "Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:75DFF289-F38B-4A43-A3C8-3F486EC8FFB0[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > > > Oh, I didn't notice the 16-bit smell of RUNDLL!!!
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > > "Tony Sperling" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The 'snag', though, seems to be that RUNDLL is not compatible with
> > > anything
> > > > > after ME, later versions is using RUNDLL32 so I assume that anything
> > > making
> > > > > a call to this library doesn't belong on XP in the first place. That
> > > leaves
> > > > > few things to suggest, in any event!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Tony. . .
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
|
|
I don't know about tz's - the hours between 22.00 and 02.00 was always where
I had my peek performance, then the bell-shaped curve takes effect, and
after driving a taxi for 25 years+ at the late shift you tend to accept that
sleep is what happens when you fall over. And hollidays are not in the
callendar. Not ever!
Tony. . .
"Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C8544423-EEAC-4D4F-BA3D-E8F96639F934[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > Wow!
> When do you sleep then?
> Is your metabolism used to some LatinAmerican timezone?
> Carlos
>
> "Tony Sperling" wrote:
>
> > That's O.K. - It's 04.00 AM here and my cell is buzzing!
> >
> > (ah - not really)
> >
> >
> > Tony. . .
> >
> >
> > "Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:C7D1D8CA-10DD-4939-8071-77785C0E810E[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > > Tony:
> > > Thanks for the tutorial.
> > > I guess I'll have to read it more thoroughly tomorrow.
> > > It is almost 11PM down here and my cell brains are active down to 10%
> > > :)
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > > "Tony Sperling" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ha!
> > > >
> > > > But it's not just the smell, it's even worse (and a bit
interresting) -
> > XP
> > > > should be able to execute 16bit instructions. The Windows System
> > consists of
> > > > many file formats, many of which are actually executables. Take the
> > > > screensavers as an example. It is probably not generally known that
they
> > can
> > > > be executed from the command-line. Fire up your favorite shell and
write
> > > > 'SSPIPES.SCR -s' and enjoy!
> > > >
> > > > In the same sense, DLL's are executables (many even have an EXE
> > extension.
> > > > Like RUNDLL32.EXE) but they cannot be executed from the command line
or
> > by
> > > > any other means. They obey a special 'Calling Convention' (Pascal)
that
> > is
> > > > never used in Windows otherwise, as I remember. This lets you call,
and
> > > > execute functions inside the file, but the file cannot be executed
in
> > it's
> > > > entirety.
> > > >
> > > > With XP they made RUNDLL to be 32bit, and then of course you can
only
> > call
> > > > it's functions via a 32bit application, so if you have an app that
is
> > making
> > > > calls to RUNDLL, it might be a solution to install RUNDLL - but it
also
> > > > might not be a good idea. . .I just don't know.
> > > >
> > > > (Sorry, for pontificating.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tony. . .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Carlos" <Carlos[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:75DFF289-F38B-4A43-A3C8-3F486EC8FFB0[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > > > > Oh, I didn't notice the 16-bit smell of RUNDLL!!!
> > > > > Carlos
> > > > >
> > > > > "Tony Sperling" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The 'snag', though, seems to be that RUNDLL is not compatible
with
> > > > anything
> > > > > > after ME, later versions is using RUNDLL32 so I assume that
anything
> > > > making
> > > > > > a call to this library doesn't belong on XP in the first place.
That
> > > > leaves
> > > > > > few things to suggest, in any event!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tony. . .
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
|
|
This isn't the proper group for you to post to. You should post to the
WindowsXP group.
You should go thru your startup programs in msconfig and try to guess which
one make sense for this file. Uncheck it (them) restart. If you can't
guess and have the problem, go to the front page and do a diagnostic
startup. If you then still have a problem, post in the other group.
"Mansion" <Mansion[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F667E1EC-F041-4AAE-97AC-8A70FB1CB1B7[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] >i am using windows XP pro with Service pack 2
>
> the issue I face is:
>
> Reply:
> Thank you for your help & assistance.
> I re-read the actual error message on my screen:
> it reads verbatim as follows--
> RUNDLL
> Error loading: C:\Windows\system32\ajaxcjsg.dll
> The specified module can not be found.
>
> I hope this helps and makes things clearer.
> Thank U
|
|
|