Werbung: SecurityConsole.de verwaltet Ihre Computer mit Security Essentails aus der Cloud!
30 Tage kostenfrei testen und 20% Rabatt für Ihre Bestellung mit Promocode: WBF2685582
(Promocode gültig bis 31.12.2011)

Group:  English: Windows Vista » microsoft.public.windows.vista.music_pictures_video
Thread: Photo Editing

HTVi
TV Discussion Newsgroups

Photo Editing
Phil Adamson 6/17/2007 8:59:00 PM
How do you remove a date that has been stamped directly onto a photo by a
digital camera?
Re: Photo Editing
Adam Albright <AA[ at ]ABC.net> 6/17/2007 9:58:53 PM
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:59:00 -0700, Phil Adamson
<PhilAdamson[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

[Quoted Text]
>How do you remove a date that has been stamped directly onto a photo by a
>digital camera?

Depends on what software you have to work with. People should stop
dating pictures since the date and much more information can now be
automatically stored by nearly any digital camera in the picture's
metadata which by the way Vista's Photo Galley will display for you if
you set it up to do so.

I was going to write a how-to, but decided to Google first and sure
enough somebody already covered the basics.

http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/digitalphotography/ss/removedate.htm

A few things you should know. How successful you are depends WHERE or
more accurately what's under the date or time stamp. If some complex
details of the picture your success rate goes down and the time to do
a good repair goes ways up.

As the above article suggests, try cropping first. Sometimes you won't
miss much since date and time stamps almost always are in a corner, so
if it is over something important whoever took the shot wasn't that
great a photographer to begin with. <grin>

If you have access to Photoshop, GIMP, Paint Shop Pro or any of the
better graphics programs you can try rubber stamp or cloning tools or
a healing brush. I wouldn't use the block method mentioned that always
ends up butt ugly unless you're just covered up some sold colored
object. Zoom way in for best results.

If you don't have any good tools, then you can always try to fix it a
few pixels at a time. Very slow, very tedious and usually not worth
the effort.

Re: Photo Editing
Phil Adamson 6/18/2007 6:37:00 PM
Thanks for that, thought there might be some majic fix but I guess I'll be
doing it the laboreous way.

"Adam Albright" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:59:00 -0700, Phil Adamson
> <PhilAdamson[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >How do you remove a date that has been stamped directly onto a photo by a
> >digital camera?
>
> Depends on what software you have to work with. People should stop
> dating pictures since the date and much more information can now be
> automatically stored by nearly any digital camera in the picture's
> metadata which by the way Vista's Photo Galley will display for you if
> you set it up to do so.
>
> I was going to write a how-to, but decided to Google first and sure
> enough somebody already covered the basics.
>
> http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/digitalphotography/ss/removedate.htm
>
> A few things you should know. How successful you are depends WHERE or
> more accurately what's under the date or time stamp. If some complex
> details of the picture your success rate goes down and the time to do
> a good repair goes ways up.
>
> As the above article suggests, try cropping first. Sometimes you won't
> miss much since date and time stamps almost always are in a corner, so
> if it is over something important whoever took the shot wasn't that
> great a photographer to begin with. <grin>
>
> If you have access to Photoshop, GIMP, Paint Shop Pro or any of the
> better graphics programs you can try rubber stamp or cloning tools or
> a healing brush. I wouldn't use the block method mentioned that always
> ends up butt ugly unless you're just covered up some sold colored
> object. Zoom way in for best results.
>
> If you don't have any good tools, then you can always try to fix it a
> few pixels at a time. Very slow, very tedious and usually not worth
> the effort.
>
>
Re: Photo Editing
"Greg" <greg.munro[ at ]bigpond.com> 6/25/2007 1:04:45 AM
The other thing I've found Photo Gallery "does for you" is strip that kind
of data from the photo when importing it. When I use Photo Gallery to import
my Olympus pictures it writes over the markers that the camera puts there to
tell the Olympus software that the photo is part of a panorama, replacing it
with information Photo Gallery uses such as the folder you imported it to.
Sometimes it destroys other similar properties data. On other occasions it
has corrupted the entire jpg file by removing the jpg markers - this seems
to happen when copying from/to USB devices over a network with an XP
machine.

I no longer use Photo Gallery to import anything. It corrupts data.

Greg


"Adam Albright" <AA[ at ]ABC.net> wrote in message
news:juab731uti2pkcojg2uuctviltpd0ndqai[ at ]4ax.com...
[Quoted Text]
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:59:00 -0700, Phil Adamson
> <PhilAdamson[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>How do you remove a date that has been stamped directly onto a photo by a
>>digital camera?
>
> Depends on what software you have to work with. People should stop
> dating pictures since the date and much more information can now be
> automatically stored by nearly any digital camera in the picture's
> metadata which by the way Vista's Photo Galley will display for you if
> you set it up to do so.
>
> I was going to write a how-to, but decided to Google first and sure
> enough somebody already covered the basics.
>
> http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/digitalphotography/ss/removedate.htm
>
> A few things you should know. How successful you are depends WHERE or
> more accurately what's under the date or time stamp. If some complex
> details of the picture your success rate goes down and the time to do
> a good repair goes ways up.
>
> As the above article suggests, try cropping first. Sometimes you won't
> miss much since date and time stamps almost always are in a corner, so
> if it is over something important whoever took the shot wasn't that
> great a photographer to begin with. <grin>
>
> If you have access to Photoshop, GIMP, Paint Shop Pro or any of the
> better graphics programs you can try rubber stamp or cloning tools or
> a healing brush. I wouldn't use the block method mentioned that always
> ends up butt ugly unless you're just covered up some sold colored
> object. Zoom way in for best results.
>
> If you don't have any good tools, then you can always try to fix it a
> few pixels at a time. Very slow, very tedious and usually not worth
> the effort.
>

Home | Search | Terms | Imprint Contact
Newsgroups Reader - provided by WiredBox.Net
Suche nach Orten, Städten, Postleitzahlen, Vorwahlen, Kfz-Kennzeichen