Sorry Babs, but I strongly disagree with you on this point. It is NOT
Microsoft's fault that Adobe wasn't prepared for Vista! Vista has been out
for months now with the Beta out for a year before that, Adobe has had plenty
of time to make its products Vista compatiable. Adobe could have been working
on Vista but dragged thier feet and cried like new born babies and now has an
aloof attitude towards thier customers (not a good way to instill brand
loyalty).
I will agree that, at first, many people did have problems with Vista, but
many of those issues have since been resolved (in large due to the people on
this newsgroup IMO). Adobe should get crap together, there are millions of
people moving to Vista, most of them have found Adobe substitutes (GIMP is a
prime example), how many will be willing to switch back when Adobe finally
wises up?
"babaloo" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > Jen, I hate to break the news, but you are blaming the wrong company.
> You should ask why Microsoft is marketing Vista as an upgrade to Windows XP
> when Vista has such strange underpinnings that is incompatible with a
> dazzling array of mainstream Windows programs, common hardware
> configurations and has driver requirements that many peripheral
> manufacturers simply seem unable to code for.
> For many, I think most, people Vista just does not work as advertised and
> you would be wise to either go back to XP or have XP available in a
> dual-boot configuration.
> In the final analysis the OS should not be your main consideration. You
> should only have to deal with using productivity programs like Elements or
> Premiere.
> Ditch Vista and your problems will disappear, non?
>
>
>
|