> Yes I understand the normal use of RAID1 and backup hierachies and how to
> logon.
>
> Why should you lose sleep if a RAID1 partner goes out and you are ruunning
> on only one prop if you have image backups? Guess it depends on the
> application which is NOT an issue in my scenario which is essentially a
> forced failure and hopefully transparent background rebuild from a
> hotswap.
>
> Are you guys telling me the ONLY way to rebuild a RAID1 partner drive is
> to shut the system down and run utilities to resync the drives?
>
> There is no autosync on a hot swap with either soft or hard RAID1???
>
> - Dave
>
> "Dustin Harper" <dharper[ at ]vistarip.com> wrote in message
> news:C6DF5BCA-A802-487A-A014-0C5245A2F8C3[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> RAID is decent for a backup, in the sense for hardware failure. But, it
>> is still onsite, and still in the same PC. Should a fire, or a multiple
>> HD failure, or a format of the array, or corruption, it isn't a backup.
>> If one HD goes bad, it's the other one that saves it. If you have an
>> offsite backup; i.e. a DVD, Tape backup, you have something that isn't
>> connected to the PC. Almost a permanent copy of the files that were there
>> when the backup was created.
>>
>> RAID has it's uses, but as a removable backup device, it's not a good
>> idea. RAID works great in servers. If a HD goes out, you replace it, and
>> you're back up and running (you can even run one, but it's all sweat and
>> sleepless nights until the other gets replaced!). But, if the the whole
>> array goes to hell, and you don't have a tape backup or other... you're
>> screwed. If you take one HD out at night for the backup, and put it back
>> in in the morning, you're still taking a chance.
>>
>> We had a RAID (which saved us!), but we also had a tape backup. The RAID
>> was the easy fix. The tape backup would be safer, but more difficult.
>> RAID isn't meant for off-site backups. It's meant for hardware failure
>> within the PC itself.
>>
>> --
>> Dustin Harper
>> dharper[ at ]vistarip.com
>>
http://www.vistarip.com>>
>> --
>> "Kerry Brown" <kerry[ at ]kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
>> news:E447CD13-FDB3-47EE-B078-18BC54843A8C[ at ]microsoft.com...
>>> What happened to you is what RAID is for. What the OP wants is to swap
>>> multiple disks in and out of a RAID 1 array for backup purposes.
>>> Depending on the controller this will eventually lead to corrupted data.
>>> The "backup" disk may not be bootable depending on the controller. The
>>> amount of time to rebuild the array will probably be longer and cause a
>>> bigger performance hit than creating a proper disk image would take.
>>> Many RAID controllers can't rebuild an array on the fly anyway. There
>>> are many reasons why using RAID for backup isn't a good idea :-) I use
>>> RAID in every server I build. They also have a backup strategy that has
>>> backups on at least two different media types.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kerry Brown
>>> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User
>>>
http://www.vistahelp.ca>>>
>>>
>>> "Dustin Harper" <dharper[ at ]vistarip.com> wrote in message
>>> news:B5C76B0C-6EAB-481E-AD8C-9CAA20E80E1C[ at ]microsoft.com...
>>>> It does work, not designed to be that way, but it works. I recently had
>>>> a RAID controller go bad, replaced it and a bad HD (power problem).
>>>> Replaced one of the two drives, rebuilt the array and back up and
>>>> running (scary few days with just one HD). We had backups, but with the
>>>> RAID array, it kept the business up and running with little down time.
>>>>
>>>> Not the easiest or correct way to use RAID, but it can save your data
>>>> in case of HD failure.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dustin Harper
>>>> dharper[ at ]vistarip.com
>>>>
http://www.vistarip.com>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "Kerry Brown" <kerry[ at ]kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
>>>> news:3006661C-0591-4817-91D8-35D3C01ECADF[ at ]microsoft.com...
>>>>> RAID stands for Redundant Array of Independent Disks. The key word is
>>>>> redundant. If a disk fails the array will not fail and the computer
>>>>> keeps working until you can schedule the down time to fix it. It works
>>>>> very well at what it was designed for. It is not and was never
>>>>> designed to be a backup system.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kerry Brown
>>>>> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User
>>>>>
http://www.vistahelp.ca>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dave" <REMOVETHISDaveAtHome[ at ]earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Ojf9SOUsHHA.1204[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> If common for it not to work what good is RAID? Gotta think there is
>>>>>> some merit to RAID and this idea than it likely wouldn't work in the
>>>>>> first place. Not ready to give up yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I already image to another drive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I want is to just be able to pull a mirrored drive and swap
>>>>>> offsite disks and let the new disk come back up to speed whether the
>>>>>> booted or the backup drive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> - Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Kerry Brown" <kerry[ at ]kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:F069DE31-3F2F-41FB-BC12-C44E392E2AA2[ at ]microsoft.com...
>>>>>>> This is indeed a very bad idea. RAID is for redundancy not backups.
>>>>>>> You would have to break the mirror, remove one drive, insert another
>>>>>>> drive, and recreate the mirror. Unless you have a very expensive
>>>>>>> hardware controller this process is not foolproof and it's common
>>>>>>> for it not to work. It's also very common that the drive you removed
>>>>>>> isn't bootable. A better solution is to use a disk imaging program
>>>>>>> and clone the hard drive to a second drive then remove the second
>>>>>>> drive. When you want another backup put in another drive and create
>>>>>>> another clone. This can be done with USB, firewire or some eSATA
>>>>>>> drives if you need to do the swapping without downing the computer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Kerry Brown
>>>>>>> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User
>>>>>>>
http://www.vistahelp.ca>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Dave" <REMOVETHISDaveAtHome[ at ]earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:%23i9li4SsHHA.3736[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>I am plenty experienced with windows hardware and software
>>>>>>>>development in most areas except am a complete newbie for raid setup
>>>>>>>>though I understand the purpose and pitfalls of each configuration
>>>>>>>>just fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have an MSI Platinum P6N with 2G, Intel E6600, SataII 3G and
>>>>>>>> three Seagate 320G Barracudas and would like to run RAID1 on the
>>>>>>>> boot drive so I can regularly [once per week] hot swap out one the
>>>>>>>> drive in the tray which is part of the mirror and haul it offsite
>>>>>>>> for a backup and then insert the previous drive that was offsite
>>>>>>>> and want it to be brought up to date as a bootable drive for the
>>>>>>>> next time I want to swap backups.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If this is too cumbersone or a bad idea then plan B is to backup
>>>>>>>> the boot drive to a RAID1 mirror and to then do what I am hoping to
>>>>>>>> do in regards to hot swapping alternating drives offsite using the
>>>>>>>> "D:" drive rather than the boot drive.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Questions:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1 - better to run hardware or software raid1 on a Vista system of
>>>>>>>> this type? Why? Do I need new RAID/SATA software drivers for Vista?
>>>>>>>> Any particularly good raid links you can recommend?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2 - using a drive hotswap tray I plan to install, can I pull one of
>>>>>>>> the mirrored drives and insert another and expect the newly
>>>>>>>> inserted drive to be updated to the current mirror status
>>>>>>>> automatically or must you normally run some utilitiy to do this?
>>>>>>>> Different for hardware or software setup?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3 - I read that older nVidia nForce chipsets had to have the OS
>>>>>>>> reinstalled if you turned on RAID1 for the boot drive. I have the
>>>>>>>> nForce 430i chipset and am wondering if they fixed this problem or
>>>>>>>> must I plan to image the OS back using Acronis and will that even
>>>>>>>> work the same as if I was still using just the one boot drive?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4 - can you in fact boot off the RAID1 partner drive if the
>>>>>>>> original boot drive fails or you have to go get the backup drive
>>>>>>>> and configure to boot the backup drive not part of a RAID
>>>>>>>> configuration?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks so much,
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>