> You can get the same affect with the current client (either 2.0 or 3.0) that
> is on the servers. The same AU client that is in XP is also on your
> Servers, there is no difference in functionality, only in how you use the
> functionality. So no change is needed from the client perspective. One
> possible solution may be to look at putting the reboot capable servers into
> a separate GPO that will allow you to schedule the install of the updates.
>
> --
> Cecil [MSFT]
> Deployment, WSUS
> Microsoft
>
> This posting is provided "As Is" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm>
> "JCLEOT" <JCL...[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>
> news:C6445791-E8C8-4E53-B2AB-9C95D1A6B9EC[ at ]microsoft.com...
>
>
>
> > Hello all,
>
> > We currently have WSUS 2.0 and are getting ready to go up to 3.0. One key
> > feature we need is the ability to install updates on servers (sever 2003
> > mostly) without administrator intervention.
>
> > Now, I totally understand why you can do this from the automatic updates
> > client on XP and NOT on servers (as it currently stands).... because you
> > would not want servers re-booting unexpectedly to install updates. Indeed
> > we
> > have many clustered servers and complicated heirarchial boot-order
> > specific
> > server startup and shutdown situations that would curl your hair. But,
> > those
> > are the exceptions, we have many servers where it would be fine on a
> > schedule.
>
> > Suppose you had more than 100 servers, an organized testing system, and
> > scheduled re-boots for installing updates in an organize fashion. So,
> > very
> > controlled conditions where altough you might automatically do this, it
> > would
> > only be after you knew very well that the pathes were OK.
>
> > Can anyone think of a way to do this? Can the new automatic updates
> > client
> > that comes with WSUS 3.0 do this? Reading the release notes I see some
> > hints
> > to possible changes that would allow this, but nothing explicit.
>
> > If this can be done, we could use WSUS 3.0 for all updates everywhere, and
> > not have to purchase a 3rd party tool that can do "push" installs. I know
> > WSUS is not push technology, it's pull. But, if I could update servers in
> > a
> > "similar" fashion that clients get their updates, then we would be set.
>
> > Thanks in advance for any help you experts can offer ;-)
>
> > Regards
> > jcleot- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -