Werbung: SecurityConsole.de verwaltet Ihre Computer mit Security Essentails aus der Cloud!
30 Tage kostenfrei testen und 20% Rabatt für Ihre Bestellung mit Promocode: WBF2685582
(Promocode gültig bis 31.12.2011)

Group:  English: Windows Server » microsoft.public.windows.server.update_services
Thread: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3

HTVi
TV Discussion Newsgroups

Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
David Andrews 5/17/2007 8:51:00 AM
Hi

I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
test environment without any problems.

The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.

I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.

The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
installed.

The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
OK as the reported times are all current.

I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
updates.

Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
find out why it has stopped working?

Regards
David
RE: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
David Andrews 5/17/2007 9:59:01 AM
Hi.

Sorry everyone!

It seems I am misreading the way some of the information is presented in
WSUS 3 and the updates are being installed!

I think there is a difference in the way WSUS 3.0 reports the computers
requiring updates figure which made me think none of the updates were being
installed correctly.

David

"David Andrews" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> Hi
>
> I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
> test environment without any problems.
>
> The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
> to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
> some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
> could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.
>
> I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
> start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
> getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.
>
> The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
> since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
> throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
> installed.
>
> The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
> OK as the reported times are all current.
>
> I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
> nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
> updates.
>
> Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
> find out why it has stopped working?
>
> Regards
> David
RE: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
Steve-UK 5/17/2007 3:29:02 PM
Actually it sounds as though you might have a problem, I had the same
problem, clients don't install updates after the upgrade. It was a port
communication problem, you can figure out which port you're using via the
admin tool, try connecting to the server on different ports. (Or check in
IIS what port the server is using).

Once you've figured out which port, the simplest thing to do is to change
the GPO that assigns the server location to the clients. Change it from
"http://servername" to "http://servername:8530" or whatever the correct port
is.

The other way of doing it is to change the properties in IIS of the WSUS
site so that it responds on port 80.
--
Steve.


"David Andrews" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> Hi.
>
> Sorry everyone!
>
> It seems I am misreading the way some of the information is presented in
> WSUS 3 and the updates are being installed!
>
> I think there is a difference in the way WSUS 3.0 reports the computers
> requiring updates figure which made me think none of the updates were being
> installed correctly.
>
> David
>
> "David Andrews" wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
> > test environment without any problems.
> >
> > The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
> > to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
> > some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
> > could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.
> >
> > I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
> > start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
> > getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.
> >
> > The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
> > since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
> > throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
> > installed.
> >
> > The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
> > OK as the reported times are all current.
> >
> > I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
> > nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
> > updates.
> >
> > Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
> > find out why it has stopped working?
> >
> > Regards
> > David
RE: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
David Andrews 5/17/2007 3:49:02 PM
Steve

Thanks for your reply.

I seem to be having difficulty locating the client connection port in the
admin tool and also which site I should be checking in IIS. Could you point
me in the right direction please?!

I have checked a couple of the May updates and it is listing computers as
having those updates installed so I 'think' its working but would like to
double-check the ports following your message.

I usually recieve calls from end users when I approve updates as well and I
haven't had any this month! You'd think after the years of rolling out
Windows Updates, they'd be used to it! :-)

Regards
David

"Steve-UK" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> Actually it sounds as though you might have a problem, I had the same
> problem, clients don't install updates after the upgrade. It was a port
> communication problem, you can figure out which port you're using via the
> admin tool, try connecting to the server on different ports. (Or check in
> IIS what port the server is using).
>
> Once you've figured out which port, the simplest thing to do is to change
> the GPO that assigns the server location to the clients. Change it from
> "http://servername" to "http://servername:8530" or whatever the correct port
> is.
>
> The other way of doing it is to change the properties in IIS of the WSUS
> site so that it responds on port 80.
> --
> Steve.
>
>
> "David Andrews" wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Sorry everyone!
> >
> > It seems I am misreading the way some of the information is presented in
> > WSUS 3 and the updates are being installed!
> >
> > I think there is a difference in the way WSUS 3.0 reports the computers
> > requiring updates figure which made me think none of the updates were being
> > installed correctly.
> >
> > David
> >
> > "David Andrews" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
> > > test environment without any problems.
> > >
> > > The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
> > > to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
> > > some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
> > > could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.
> > >
> > > I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
> > > start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
> > > getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.
> > >
> > > The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
> > > since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
> > > throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
> > > installed.
> > >
> > > The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
> > > OK as the reported times are all current.
> > >
> > > I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
> > > nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
> > > updates.
> > >
> > > Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
> > > find out why it has stopped working?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > David
RE: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
Steve-UK 5/17/2007 11:48:00 PM
You should have a site listed as "WSUS Administration". Go to the properties
of it, change the TCP port to port 80. If you're hosting other websites on
IIS, you will need to change their ports as well to prevent a conflict. This
can get messy, which is why I suggested changing the connection port in the
GPO instead, it's simpler. Usually it would be 8530, but it could be 443 or
8531 depending on how you set it up.

I'd only recommend changing the port in IIS if you're only using IIS on that
server for WSUS. You will have at least one other website, the default one,
you can safely change that to some miscellaneous port if you're not using it.
--
Steve.


"David Andrews" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> Steve
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I seem to be having difficulty locating the client connection port in the
> admin tool and also which site I should be checking in IIS. Could you point
> me in the right direction please?!
>
> I have checked a couple of the May updates and it is listing computers as
> having those updates installed so I 'think' its working but would like to
> double-check the ports following your message.
>
> I usually recieve calls from end users when I approve updates as well and I
> haven't had any this month! You'd think after the years of rolling out
> Windows Updates, they'd be used to it! :-)
>
> Regards
> David
>
> "Steve-UK" wrote:
>
> > Actually it sounds as though you might have a problem, I had the same
> > problem, clients don't install updates after the upgrade. It was a port
> > communication problem, you can figure out which port you're using via the
> > admin tool, try connecting to the server on different ports. (Or check in
> > IIS what port the server is using).
> >
> > Once you've figured out which port, the simplest thing to do is to change
> > the GPO that assigns the server location to the clients. Change it from
> > "http://servername" to "http://servername:8530" or whatever the correct port
> > is.
> >
> > The other way of doing it is to change the properties in IIS of the WSUS
> > site so that it responds on port 80.
> > --
> > Steve.
> >
> >
> > "David Andrews" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Sorry everyone!
> > >
> > > It seems I am misreading the way some of the information is presented in
> > > WSUS 3 and the updates are being installed!
> > >
> > > I think there is a difference in the way WSUS 3.0 reports the computers
> > > requiring updates figure which made me think none of the updates were being
> > > installed correctly.
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
> > > > test environment without any problems.
> > > >
> > > > The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
> > > > to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
> > > > some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
> > > > could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.
> > > >
> > > > I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
> > > > start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
> > > > getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.
> > > >
> > > > The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
> > > > since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
> > > > throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
> > > > installed.
> > > >
> > > > The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
> > > > OK as the reported times are all current.
> > > >
> > > > I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
> > > > nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
> > > > updates.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
> > > > find out why it has stopped working?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > David
RE: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
David Andrews 5/18/2007 8:31:00 AM
Steve

I think I used to have a WSUS Administration site before the upgrade but am
assuming it removed it since WSUS 3 uses the MMC rather than the web
interface.

On my WSUS server, in IIS, I only have the Default Website which contains
the following:

ApiRemoting30
ClientWebService
Content
DssAuthWebServer
Inventory
ReportingWebService
SelfUpdate
ServerSyncWebService
SimpleAuthWebService

The defauit website is set to Port 80.

The only other task this server performs is RIS (Remote Installation Server).

Currently my GPO for WSUS is just set to the site without any port number.

David

"Steve-UK" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> You should have a site listed as "WSUS Administration". Go to the properties
> of it, change the TCP port to port 80. If you're hosting other websites on
> IIS, you will need to change their ports as well to prevent a conflict. This
> can get messy, which is why I suggested changing the connection port in the
> GPO instead, it's simpler. Usually it would be 8530, but it could be 443 or
> 8531 depending on how you set it up.
>
> I'd only recommend changing the port in IIS if you're only using IIS on that
> server for WSUS. You will have at least one other website, the default one,
> you can safely change that to some miscellaneous port if you're not using it.
> --
> Steve.
>
>
> "David Andrews" wrote:
>
> > Steve
> >
> > Thanks for your reply.
> >
> > I seem to be having difficulty locating the client connection port in the
> > admin tool and also which site I should be checking in IIS. Could you point
> > me in the right direction please?!
> >
> > I have checked a couple of the May updates and it is listing computers as
> > having those updates installed so I 'think' its working but would like to
> > double-check the ports following your message.
> >
> > I usually recieve calls from end users when I approve updates as well and I
> > haven't had any this month! You'd think after the years of rolling out
> > Windows Updates, they'd be used to it! :-)
> >
> > Regards
> > David
> >
> > "Steve-UK" wrote:
> >
> > > Actually it sounds as though you might have a problem, I had the same
> > > problem, clients don't install updates after the upgrade. It was a port
> > > communication problem, you can figure out which port you're using via the
> > > admin tool, try connecting to the server on different ports. (Or check in
> > > IIS what port the server is using).
> > >
> > > Once you've figured out which port, the simplest thing to do is to change
> > > the GPO that assigns the server location to the clients. Change it from
> > > "http://servername" to "http://servername:8530" or whatever the correct port
> > > is.
> > >
> > > The other way of doing it is to change the properties in IIS of the WSUS
> > > site so that it responds on port 80.
> > > --
> > > Steve.
> > >
> > >
> > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry everyone!
> > > >
> > > > It seems I am misreading the way some of the information is presented in
> > > > WSUS 3 and the updates are being installed!
> > > >
> > > > I think there is a difference in the way WSUS 3.0 reports the computers
> > > > requiring updates figure which made me think none of the updates were being
> > > > installed correctly.
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
> > > > > test environment without any problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
> > > > > to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
> > > > > some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
> > > > > could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
> > > > > start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
> > > > > getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.
> > > > >
> > > > > The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
> > > > > since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
> > > > > throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
> > > > > installed.
> > > > >
> > > > > The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
> > > > > OK as the reported times are all current.
> > > > >
> > > > > I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
> > > > > nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
> > > > > updates.
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
> > > > > find out why it has stopped working?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > David
RE: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
Steve-UK 5/18/2007 2:22:02 PM
The port number it needs to communicate on will be the same as the one the
admin tool is set to, so check your settings in there. If it's something
other than port 80 you need to change in your GPO the port number to the
correct one, i.e. http://servername:8530 or whatever it is.

If it is port 80 already, I think you've got a different problem, it still
sounds like an IIS misconfiguration to me though.
--
Steve.


"David Andrews" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> Steve
>
> I think I used to have a WSUS Administration site before the upgrade but am
> assuming it removed it since WSUS 3 uses the MMC rather than the web
> interface.
>
> On my WSUS server, in IIS, I only have the Default Website which contains
> the following:
>
> ApiRemoting30
> ClientWebService
> Content
> DssAuthWebServer
> Inventory
> ReportingWebService
> SelfUpdate
> ServerSyncWebService
> SimpleAuthWebService
>
> The defauit website is set to Port 80.
>
> The only other task this server performs is RIS (Remote Installation Server).
>
> Currently my GPO for WSUS is just set to the site without any port number.
>
> David
>
> "Steve-UK" wrote:
>
> > You should have a site listed as "WSUS Administration". Go to the properties
> > of it, change the TCP port to port 80. If you're hosting other websites on
> > IIS, you will need to change their ports as well to prevent a conflict. This
> > can get messy, which is why I suggested changing the connection port in the
> > GPO instead, it's simpler. Usually it would be 8530, but it could be 443 or
> > 8531 depending on how you set it up.
> >
> > I'd only recommend changing the port in IIS if you're only using IIS on that
> > server for WSUS. You will have at least one other website, the default one,
> > you can safely change that to some miscellaneous port if you're not using it.
> > --
> > Steve.
> >
> >
> > "David Andrews" wrote:
> >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply.
> > >
> > > I seem to be having difficulty locating the client connection port in the
> > > admin tool and also which site I should be checking in IIS. Could you point
> > > me in the right direction please?!
> > >
> > > I have checked a couple of the May updates and it is listing computers as
> > > having those updates installed so I 'think' its working but would like to
> > > double-check the ports following your message.
> > >
> > > I usually recieve calls from end users when I approve updates as well and I
> > > haven't had any this month! You'd think after the years of rolling out
> > > Windows Updates, they'd be used to it! :-)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > David
> > >
> > > "Steve-UK" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Actually it sounds as though you might have a problem, I had the same
> > > > problem, clients don't install updates after the upgrade. It was a port
> > > > communication problem, you can figure out which port you're using via the
> > > > admin tool, try connecting to the server on different ports. (Or check in
> > > > IIS what port the server is using).
> > > >
> > > > Once you've figured out which port, the simplest thing to do is to change
> > > > the GPO that assigns the server location to the clients. Change it from
> > > > "http://servername" to "http://servername:8530" or whatever the correct port
> > > > is.
> > > >
> > > > The other way of doing it is to change the properties in IIS of the WSUS
> > > > site so that it responds on port 80.
> > > > --
> > > > Steve.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry everyone!
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems I am misreading the way some of the information is presented in
> > > > > WSUS 3 and the updates are being installed!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think there is a difference in the way WSUS 3.0 reports the computers
> > > > > requiring updates figure which made me think none of the updates were being
> > > > > installed correctly.
> > > > >
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
> > > > > > test environment without any problems.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
> > > > > > to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
> > > > > > some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
> > > > > > could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
> > > > > > start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
> > > > > > getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
> > > > > > since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
> > > > > > throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
> > > > > > installed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
> > > > > > OK as the reported times are all current.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
> > > > > > nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
> > > > > > updates.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
> > > > > > find out why it has stopped working?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > David
RE: Clients not recieving updates following upgrade to WSUS 3
David Andrews 5/21/2007 9:58:02 AM
Steve

Thanks for your help with this.

I've spotted where the port number is in the WSUS Admin tool, I was looking
in the Options and settings areas and suddenly realised it is on the Server
Overview Page!

It is using port 80 and does appear to be working fine.

I approved some updates which would only effect a couple of PCs including
mine (running Vista) and I recieved those updates without any problem.

Regards
David

"Steve-UK" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> The port number it needs to communicate on will be the same as the one the
> admin tool is set to, so check your settings in there. If it's something
> other than port 80 you need to change in your GPO the port number to the
> correct one, i.e. http://servername:8530 or whatever it is.
>
> If it is port 80 already, I think you've got a different problem, it still
> sounds like an IIS misconfiguration to me though.
> --
> Steve.
>
>
> "David Andrews" wrote:
>
> > Steve
> >
> > I think I used to have a WSUS Administration site before the upgrade but am
> > assuming it removed it since WSUS 3 uses the MMC rather than the web
> > interface.
> >
> > On my WSUS server, in IIS, I only have the Default Website which contains
> > the following:
> >
> > ApiRemoting30
> > ClientWebService
> > Content
> > DssAuthWebServer
> > Inventory
> > ReportingWebService
> > SelfUpdate
> > ServerSyncWebService
> > SimpleAuthWebService
> >
> > The defauit website is set to Port 80.
> >
> > The only other task this server performs is RIS (Remote Installation Server).
> >
> > Currently my GPO for WSUS is just set to the site without any port number.
> >
> > David
> >
> > "Steve-UK" wrote:
> >
> > > You should have a site listed as "WSUS Administration". Go to the properties
> > > of it, change the TCP port to port 80. If you're hosting other websites on
> > > IIS, you will need to change their ports as well to prevent a conflict. This
> > > can get messy, which is why I suggested changing the connection port in the
> > > GPO instead, it's simpler. Usually it would be 8530, but it could be 443 or
> > > 8531 depending on how you set it up.
> > >
> > > I'd only recommend changing the port in IIS if you're only using IIS on that
> > > server for WSUS. You will have at least one other website, the default one,
> > > you can safely change that to some miscellaneous port if you're not using it.
> > > --
> > > Steve.
> > >
> > >
> > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your reply.
> > > >
> > > > I seem to be having difficulty locating the client connection port in the
> > > > admin tool and also which site I should be checking in IIS. Could you point
> > > > me in the right direction please?!
> > > >
> > > > I have checked a couple of the May updates and it is listing computers as
> > > > having those updates installed so I 'think' its working but would like to
> > > > double-check the ports following your message.
> > > >
> > > > I usually recieve calls from end users when I approve updates as well and I
> > > > haven't had any this month! You'd think after the years of rolling out
> > > > Windows Updates, they'd be used to it! :-)
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > "Steve-UK" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Actually it sounds as though you might have a problem, I had the same
> > > > > problem, clients don't install updates after the upgrade. It was a port
> > > > > communication problem, you can figure out which port you're using via the
> > > > > admin tool, try connecting to the server on different ports. (Or check in
> > > > > IIS what port the server is using).
> > > > >
> > > > > Once you've figured out which port, the simplest thing to do is to change
> > > > > the GPO that assigns the server location to the clients. Change it from
> > > > > "http://servername" to "http://servername:8530" or whatever the correct port
> > > > > is.
> > > > >
> > > > > The other way of doing it is to change the properties in IIS of the WSUS
> > > > > site so that it responds on port 80.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Steve.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry everyone!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems I am misreading the way some of the information is presented in
> > > > > > WSUS 3 and the updates are being installed!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think there is a difference in the way WSUS 3.0 reports the computers
> > > > > > requiring updates figure which made me think none of the updates were being
> > > > > > installed correctly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > David
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "David Andrews" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I recently upgraded our WSUS 2 server to WSUS 3 after running the RC in a
> > > > > > > test environment without any problems.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The WSUS 3 installation went fine and it updated the local database engine
> > > > > > > to the new version (currently not using SQL Server but intend to move it at
> > > > > > > some point) and it is showing all the registered client computers that I
> > > > > > > could see under WSUS 2 along with their status etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I recently approved the May updates for installation and expected them to
> > > > > > > start being rolled out the following morning but it seems the clients are not
> > > > > > > getting the update information like they did prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The WSUS 3 details for computers requiring updates has not changed at all
> > > > > > > since approving the May updates and usually I would see this figure reduce
> > > > > > > throughout the day as people rebooted their PCs following the updates being
> > > > > > > installed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The client computers appear to be reporting their status to the WSUS server
> > > > > > > OK as the reported times are all current.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I cannot see any errors in the event log on the WSUS server and there is
> > > > > > > nothing to suggest any problems except that the clients are being sent the
> > > > > > > updates.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone else had this or similar issue or suggest where I can look to
> > > > > > > find out why it has stopped working?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > David

Home | Search | Terms | Imprint Contact
Newsgroups Reader - provided by WiredBox.Net
Suche nach Orten, Städten, Postleitzahlen, Vorwahlen, Kfz-Kennzeichen