> Interesting... If I understand correctly, you're saying that the original
> message source is not saved?
>
> Some how, some way, there MUST be a way to extract all of this information
> in one fell swoop!
>
> It is simply too unthinkable that MS would back a product, in this day and
> age of mega-spam, that is not more friendly to spam reduction tools and
> techniques.
>
> Is the plugin that I suggest still creatable? Or is Outlook in the "end
> game"?
>
>
>
> "Dmitry Streblechenko" wrote:
>
>> Because Outlook itself (unlike OE) never uses the MIME source and it
>> would
>> be a waste of space to store both the original data and the MAPI
>> properties
>> created by parsing the MIME message.
>> And if a message is sent between two Exchange mailboxes, a mesage would
>> never even be converted to the MIME format.
>>
>> Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
>>
http://www.dimastr.com/>> OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
>> and MAPI Developer Tool
>>
>> "coastaldata" <coastaldata[ at ]community.nospam> wrote in message
>> news:93DBFCDE-7DE0-4FA1-A605-26DA1EA68AAC[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> > Hello, I've tried the Microsoft Junk Mail Reporting tool, but I still
>> > prefer
>> > to use SpamCop.net for spam submissions, because it is a more technical
>> > service that has a lot of connectivity (to blackhole lists and the
>> > like).
>> >
>> > What I can't figure out is why MS insists that it should be so darn
>> > difficult to extract the *full un-modified source* of a message! It
>> > gets
>> > harder and harder to do with each version.
>> >
>> > In Outlook 2003, I used an add-in called "OLSpamCop", which is free,
>> > but
>> > not
>> > longer works with 2007.
>> >
>> > I would like to find or build an addin for Outlook 2007 which VERY
>> > SIMPLY
>> > opens notepad with the FULL MESSAGE SOURCE for any selected message.
>> > This
>> > should include headers, encoded attachments, and the message body.
>> >
>> > Does anybody know of such a plugin already in existence, or have any
>> > tips
>> > for code samples to help me on my way?
>> >
>> > This should be so simple and obvious, I just can't imagine why MS does
>> > not
>> > already provide this capability.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> >
>> > --CoDE
>>
>>
>>