"Rainald Taesler" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > EmeryN wrote: > > > Is there a mechanism that I am missing that makes it possible to > > easily search for just a section name or part across all of the > > notebooks I have? > > Unfortunately not. > One can search for pages but not for sections and section groups. > > In order to see what you have you may use the "All notebooks" feature > (bar at the bottom in the navigation pane). > > A workaround might be to manually create your own Index-page which lists > all of the sections in all notebooks. The entries can be hyperlinked to > the sections. > This would require to update this Index whenever you create a new > section. > > It would mean quite some work to create the Index manually. But when > doing so you might detect redundancies and having a better overview on > what is where might be of great help for sorting / re-organizing things. > > Rainald > > >
Unfortunately, I have over 140 folders, section groups and sections in the first of 5 onenote notebooks. So far, each of the others has at least this many as well.
I just figured that I was missing something in the realm of usability and that there must be a shortcut key or something to allow for the type of search I need. With this amount of data and growing daily, Onenote becomes useless after it reaches one's own memory (in the brain) limitations.
In my case, I am a seasoned citizen that is trying to use Onenote to help compensate for my fading memory but it now seems like it will be about as useful as a package of post-it notes. I thought it was the perfect tool between the PC based and mobile based versions and its integration to use Sharepoint workspaces but, alas, I am drawn up short at the very brink of success.
Rats!
Thanks for your response, though.
I am thinking that, for now, Each section I create can start with a section identifier page that will be the name of that section with some unique fixed text string concatenated to it to limit the hits to just section names. .. Not the solution I wanted but easier than trying to manually maintain a parallel index (which never works, anyway).
|