> QUESTIONS:
> 1. Has anyone figured out how to successfully install the Office 97
> Pro Service Release 2 patch in Vista?
> 2. Has anyone successfully installed an Office 97 Pro CD (SR2
> version) in Vista?
>
>
> DETAILS:
> My setup: Dell Inspiron notebook with Vista Business edition
> My CD: Office 97 Professional (Service Release 1) Upgrade
>
> I had no problems installing from the Office 97 CD. I ran the
> setup.exe file on the CD "as administrator" with no errors.
>
> When I tried to install Service Release 2b (SR2b) patch (again, as
> administrator), the installation failed. Scanning the SR2b
> installation log, I noticed the following lines that indicated
> problems.
>
> At the end of the "Access bucket file copy starts" section are the
> lines:
>
> * Move C:\Windows\Fonts\tahoma.ttf to C:\Windows\Fonts\sr1E639.tmp
> * Unable to open C:\Windows\Fonts\tahoma.ttf
> * sr2 patch fail
>
> Under the following "Back up has started...." section are the lines:
>
> * deleted C:\Windows\Fonts\tahoma.ttf
> * unable to restore C:\Windows\Fonts\sr1E639.tmp to C:\Windows\Fonts
> \tahoma.ttf
> * Backup has finished.
> * The patch has rollback the file copy due to either user cancelation
> or problem w/ file copy. Your system has been restored to its orginal
> state. If you did not cancel the file copy, please contact Microsoft
> Technical Support to upgrade to Office 97 SR2.
> * The sr2 patch has failed
>
>
> UPGRADING TO A NEWER VERSION OF ACCESS: I understand that some will
> suggest that we "buy a newer version". Besides the huge financial
> investment required to upgrade all of our workstations (both hardware
> and software/licenses), there's the multiple conversion steps involved
> with moving our many Access projects to the newest versions (97 to
> 2000/2002/2003 then to 2007).
>
http://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/1dce641e-ba1c-446a-8ff2-221769a58ba51033.mspx?mfr=true)> I've also read that the later versions of Access are more buggy and
> slower than the 97 version.
>
> Office 97 meets our needs and has been working great. I just hope I
> can get it to work in Vista (fingers crossed).
>