"Patrick Schmid [MVP]" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > Most users have no real reason to use the 64-bit version of Vista > instead of the 32-bit one, so I would recommend to just stick with the > 32 bit.
Except for the vastly improved security and reliability you mean? At home I have two *identical* machines, only one has to run 32 bit because it needs a wireless usb connection, and guess which fails to shut down properly, and locks up for periods for no reason.
Read http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_ff_x64.asp
I can't believe an MVP would be saying "Oh, 32bit isn't important." We have *one* 32bit PC in our office. The rest of us are 64bit XP or Vista.
* CIO's want 64bit because its vastly more secure (Address Space Layout Randmonizer, NX, Hardware DEP, Enforced driver signing) * Our customers need 64bit because we blow 2Gb in a heartbeat. * Gamers want 64bit because it breaks the 2Gb limit and runs much faster. * Home users don't like it because of a lack of drivers.
So what does Microsoft do? NOT PROVIDE DRIVERS FOR 64Bit OneNote! Good example guys.
|