> ----This question is for outlook 2003------
>
> Hi,
>
> (1) Can you help me jot down some cons (actually I need several) for this
> approach (subclassing) .
>
> I did prototype the way you suggested (proxy the original Outlook form by
> handling NewInspector and not displaying the Outlook form and displaying
> an
> alternate form), but it looses a lot of default functionality of the
> appointment, re-building all of which is a lot of effort.
>
> (2) Alternatively, Is it possible to add a 2 editable textboxes in the
> custom-bar in the apppointment inspector via a addin ?
>
> thanks again
>
>
> "Ken Slovak - [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:
>
>> It would one-off the form because you'd be adding controls to it on the
>> fly.
>> That's guaranteed to do that. If you insist on this method I can't help
>> you
>> any further because it's so wrong.
>>
>> --
>> Ken Slovak
>> [MVP - Outlook]
>>
http://www.slovaktech.com>> Author: Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Outlook 2003
>> Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options
>>
http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm>>
>>
>> "newToOutlookProgramming"
>> <newToOutlookProgramming[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:F887A179-241E-4B6D-ADC1-0EB4E8029CE5[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I did consider adding a control to open a separate form , but it has
>> > usability issue.
>> > I also prototyped displaying an alternate form, but it also involves
>> > rebuilding a lot of functionality which comes free in native outlook
>> > form
>> > like all the menus (File ....etc), Scheduling Tab etc.
>> > Also considered hiding just appointment tab, and building tab P-2 &
>> > renaming
>> > it. this requires lot of activex controls for date-time, reminder,
>> > sound,
>> > label etc etc fields because these are not in custom form toolbox.
>> >
>> > So, Prototyping using Subclassing mechanism is atleast worth trying.
>> > Why
>> > would a form be one-offed by this?
>> >
>> > My requirement is to add few fields on appoitnment from from local
>> > database,
>> > and NOT loose any native functionality at the same time.
>> >
>> > Hence, looking for details/codesnippet of implementing subclassing
>> > appointment form.
>> >
>> > thanks
>>
>>