> On Mar 6, 12:52 pm, "Clinton Ford [MSFT]"
>
> <ClintonFordM...[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > SQL Server is designed to consume freememoryto improve performance. It will release thememoryafter a while if no inbound
> > connections are received. SQL Server will also freememorywhen the Operating System notifies applications that it is low onmemory.
>
> > Are you running into any specific problems due to low systemmemory?
> > --
> > Visit team blog at
http://blogs.msdn.com/bcm> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights"MrSlep" <MrS...[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in messagenews:CA930B79-5F87-4C4B-BD30-792CEEF86692[ at ]microsoft.com...
>
> > I'm running Outlook w/BusinessContactManager....and SQLservr is currently
> > taking 840MB ofRAM(after sitting idol overnight). It seems there is amemoryleak-- asBusinessContactManagerrunsRAMusagecontinues to
> > increase.
>
> > Is anyone else having this problem?
>
> I've continued to have this problem and while I totally understand the
> nature of SQL consuming additional RAM as it needs and releasing it
> (similar to Exchange, I would think), I totally couldn't understand
> why my BCM's database would consume as much as 800MB of RAM in
> addition to 1.5GB of my virtual memory.
>
> With Exchange, I've found that this would happen if the Antivirus
> program was scanning the Exchange Databases, and excluding them would
> significantly lower the RAM usage of the store.exe process. So I
> followed the same logic with BCM's SQL DB's and sure enough, the
> memory usage plummeted. Although the virtual memory remained high...
> I can live with that!
>
> Jeffrey B. Kane
> TechSoEasy
> San Francisco, CA
http://www.techsoeasy.com