> EMRhelp.org wrote:
> > ====
> > Then Microsoft OneNote 2007 was released, sporting a new "shared
> > notebook" feature. With OneNote, you get the same ease of access and
> > ease of editing that a wiki provides, but with a much smoother
> > experience. To mirror the history log functionality of a wiki, you can
> > store your shared notebook in a versioned SharePoint document
> > library.
>
> > source -
http://flimflan.com/blog/MigrateFromFlexWikiToOneNote.aspx> > ====
>
> > I thought that Sharepoint wrecked the native OneNote Synching and
> > brought it down to the level of file synching. Anyone ?
>
> That depends on exactly what you mean by "level of file syncing". It is
> true that there is no option on SharePoint to update just a part of the
> file, so OneNote does need to transfer the entire file any time a change
> is made, either on the client or on the server. However, partial access
> is only an optimization, and OneNote can still sync just fine without
> it, although at a slower rate.
>
> Problems occur when multiple instances of OneNote access the same file
> and then some other underlying technology thinks that those files are
> the same and tries to resolve the situation without asking OneNote. That
> doesn't occur on SharePoint though - there is just one copy of the file
> involved, so OneNote is able to detect and merge changes from multiple
> users without any problems.
>
> Ilya