Peter, Thank you for responding to my questions, I did however figure out what was happening
I use UltrEdit to type in my xml/Wordml code and I had converted the xml to Cr/Lf's and this was scattering my binary image data which made it un recognizable once this was done
Right now I can cut sand paste binary image data from one file to another and it is working great and that all I wanted to do...
Thanks
Jeff W.
"Peter Flynn" <peter.nosp[ at ]m.silmaril.ie> wrote in message news:6qiqclFcfrd7U1[ at ]mid.individual.net...
[Quoted Text] > Jeff wrote: >> I can open a blank word document and save it as a xml file and I have >> built a form >> I use this way but now I need to put in a simple logo with a .gif or bmp >> or what ever >> but I can seem to get it to work. >> >> I can add this ot the blank document before saving to xml and it works >> fine but >> if I cut and paste the xml code for the picture into another blank xml >> sheet it >> come up with an enpty picture in the file. >> >> I am at my wits end searching the web for examples that dont seem to work >> >> Is there another way to do this that anyone could share with me? >> >> any advice would be helpful, this seems so simple > > Images in Word XML documents are stored in an encoded format (eg > UUencode). They can only be displayed by Word or another program (eg > OpenOffice) that understands what to do with the encoded data (ie find it > and decode it to an image). In WordML the image data is inline to its > location in the document. In OOXML the image data and the image reference > are separated by another level of indirection, via an ID/IDREF link. To > create this externally under program control you will need to study the > internal details of the mechanism and get all the components right (using > a toolkit is the best way). > > > this seems so simple > > Wordprocessor internal formats are not simple because they must allow for > all conceivable random behaviours, both by the user and by the program. > There are many other much easier formats to generate and manipulate, but > their end-user interface requires more foreknowledge or training, whereas > Word can be used by anyone with no knowledge at all (and often is :-) > > ///Peter
|