> Dear Sylvain,
>
> I have an important customer who has upgraded to SQL Server 2005 with 9
> ADP
> databases I have designed for them.
>
> This upgrade was done for replication purposes for other SQL Server
> applications not my databases.
>
> From you reply to this post - Am I now having to update all comboboxes to
> use store procedures or to use SELECT statements from Views in order to
> get
> sorted lists?
>
> This looks like a mountain of work but I assume because 2005 treats Views
> as
> Tables unlike 200.
> --
> Bob Snedden, MCT, MCSD.Net
>
>
> "Sylvain Lafontaine" wrote:
>
>> There are no sorting order in Views because they are interpreted like
>> tables. Under some circonstances, adding a TOP 100 PERCENT will give you
>> the impression that this work but as you might now see, this doesn't work
>> 100% of the time on all platforms/applications.
>>
>> Use a Select statement to query your view and add your Order By to it.
>>
>> --
>> Sylvain Lafontaine, ing.
>> MVP - Technologies Virtual-PC
>> E-mail: sylvain aei ca (fill the blanks, no spam please)
>>
>>
>> "AkAlan via AccessMonster.com" <u18147[ at ]uwe> wrote in message
>> news:8daee91c7a5b5[ at ]uwe...
>> >I have a view created with a sort order on the SiteName field but it
>> >sorts
>> >in
>> > the SiteID field. Am I missing simething here?
>> >
>> > SELECT DISTINCT TOP 100 PERCENT dbo.QcCar.SiteID, dbo.QcSites.SiteName
>> > FROM dbo.QcSites RIGHT OUTER JOIN
>> > dbo.QcCar ON dbo.QcSites.QcSitesId =
>> > dbo.QcCar.SiteID
>> > WHERE (dbo.QcCar.QcFinalReviewDate IS NULL)
>> > ORDER BY dbo.QcSites.SiteName
>> >
>> > --
>> > Message posted via AccessMonster.com
>> >
http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-adp-sqlserver/200811/1>> >
>>
>>
>>