> From the Windows Task Manager \ Processes \ Outlook:
> When I enter the SaveToMsg() function - Mem Usage = 31,592 KB, and number
> of
> handles 587.
> When returning from the function, Mem Usage = 31,672 KB, Handles = 594.
> Note that this increase in memory is not fixed and I think that it depends
> on the Mail Size. Imaging what will happen when saving 10,000 mail or
> more!!!
> In the following table (it will not shown as a table here!!!), I wrote the
> values of memory and handles after each call in the SaveToMag().
>
> Time Mem Usage (KB) No. of
> Handles
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> When enter the SaveToMsg 31,592 587
> After StgCreateDocfile 31,616 594
> After OpenIMsgSession No Change No Change
> After OpenIMsgOnIStg 31,624 No Change
> After WriteClassStg No Change No Change
> After CopyTo 31,848 595
> After SaveChanges 31,960 594
> After Commit 31,968 No
> Change
> After pStorage->Release No Change No Change
> After pIMsg->Release 31,672 No Change
> After CloseIMsgSession No Change No Change
> After{
> pStorage = NULL;
> pIMsg = NULL;
> pMsgSession = NULL;} No Change No Change
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I hope someone can help on this.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------
> "Dmitry Streblechenko" wrote:
>
>> And how does the memory leak manifest itself?
>>
>> Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
>>
http://www.dimastr.com/>> OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
>> and MAPI Developer Tool
>>
>> "MON205" <MON205[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:DB90C854-84BC-437F-8B89-36BCEC2E0BCD[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> > Hello,
>> > I found that the scenario in the Microsoft link:
>> >
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/171907>> > leads into memory leak!!!!!!
>> > What is the problem?!!!
>> >
>> > "MON205" wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'll take this in consideration.
>> >> Thanks a lot.
>> >>
>> >> "Dmitry Streblechenko" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I'd rather open the message on the secondary thread.
>> >> > I also have a feeling that spawning a secondary thread just to save
>> >> > a
>> >> > single
>> >> > message will actually make the performance worse.
>> >> >
>> >> > Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
>> >> >
http://www.dimastr.com/>> >> > OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
>> >> > and MAPI Developer Tool
>> >> >
>> >> > "MON205" <MON205[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> > news:DCA39D61-11C5-435D-84D9-6EF14449DA4C[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> >> > > Oh...
>> >> > > Thanks a lot for fast response...
>> >> > > Now, if I pass a message interface to a thread to save it, is this
>> >> > > a
>> >> > > thread
>> >> > > safe?!!
>> >> > > Thanks again.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "Dmitry Streblechenko" wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> Yes, you can use MAPI to do that:
>> >> > >>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/171907>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
>> >> > >>
http://www.dimastr.com/>> >> > >> OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
>> >> > >> and MAPI Developer Tool
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> "MON205" <MON205[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> > >> news:CC92C0EA-03EA-4D90-8EB8-1585F507103D[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> >> > >> > Hello all,
>> >> > >> > after months of working in an addin for outlook using OOM, I
>> >> > >> > found
>> >> > >> > a
>> >> > >> > big
>> >> > >> > problem which is that OOM is not multithreaded as discussed in:
>> >> > >> >
http://groups.google.jo/group/microsoft.public.outlook.program_addins/browse_thread/thread/3b5bca8446787d33/0a3609c5934618a8?lnk=st&q=oom+thread+marshal&rnum=1&hl=en#0a3609c5934618a8>> >> > >> >
http://groups.google.jo/group/microsoft.public.developer.outlook.addins/browse_thread/thread/3984df29384d8816/0cd9ee67eed9d3c7?lnk=st&q=oom+thread+marshal&rnum=3&hl=en#0cd9ee67eed9d3c7>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Problems started with multithreaded as I described in an
>> >> > >> > earlier
>> >> > >> > question
>> >> > >> >
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/list/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.outlook.program_addins&tid=862b6119-97e1-4fe1-b867-fc26dbc0b2b5&cat=en_us_7d8c5004-1d0a-4e14-a6a2-3d04905df293&lang=en&cr=us&p=1>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > and then I found that the problem is threading problem.
>> >> > >> > Now I used marshaling in my threads, threading now is
>> >> > >> > acceptable,
>> >> > >> > but a
>> >> > >> > one
>> >> > >> > problem found, which is when I call the SaveAs() method of the
>> >> > >> > MailItem,
>> >> > >> > the
>> >> > >> > mouse cursor changed to busy. I don't want this scenario... can
>> >> > >> > I
>> >> > >> > prevent
>> >> > >> > it?!!
>> >> > >> > It is possible to move to other technologies like MAPI, but how
>> >> > >> > can I
>> >> > >> > save
>> >> > >> > mails?!!
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Please help...
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>>
>>
>>