This is a security change in Outlook 2007, long overdue, IMO. The following policy setting is available in the Outlk12.adm file for use with a Group Policy Object:
Do not allow folders in non-default stores to be set as folder home pages
Key: HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\Security
Value name: NonDefaultStoreScript
Value type: DWORD
Values: 0 = do not allow FHPs in non-default stores (default), 1 = allow
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
"T-rev" <trevor_getty[ at ]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Oer8cW92GHA.4748[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
[Quoted Text] > We have implemented a mapi messageStore provider in MAPI with some exchange
> extensions addins which has worked for a long time now, in outlook2000, XP
> and 2003.
>
> Now working with:
> outlook2007 beta 2.
>
> Background.
> At present I am having a problem with PR_FOLDER_WEBVIEWINFO property found
> on folders. Outlook2007 is no longer following this property found on any
> folder within our messageStore. I have noticed that the homepage tab in the
> folder properties is read only (dont know if this is in anyway related) on
> all of our folders in 2007 also.
>
> If you implement an exchange store in 2007 the folderproperties homePage tab
> is not readonly - I can specifiy my URL or file and it follows to
> the link fine. Although on the same vein - if I add a PST store, add a
> folder, it also does not allow read-write access to this homepage tab.Same
> behaviour as our messageStore.
>
> Any ideas what would have changed to make this homePage tab readonly AND /
> OR make the folder no longer follow URL links??.
>
> I have full accessLevel, access on the folder, and also have the property
> PR_FOLDER_WEBVIEWINFO filled in exactly as is in the exchange store
> property, which is working in previous versions. I have looked for any
> relevant flags which may have changed in the PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK but can't
> see anything relevant there.
>
> Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
>
|