.net 2.0 problems Rog <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> 3/17/2006 5:22:39 PM I developed my addin in Visual Studio 2003 using .net 1.1, now when I try to run my addin on a machine that has .net 2.0 it does not load and in fact the load behavior changes from 3 to 2 even though it works fine on a machine with .net 1.1 installed. Any ideas? Thanks

Re: .net 2.0 problems "Eugene E. Starostin" <eestar[ at ]afalinasoft.com> 3/17/2006 5:32:20 PM Hello, 1. Are there other add-ins developed on .net framework 2.0 installed on this machine? 2. Have you cheked your add-in in the disabled items? 3. Have you installed the hotfix for framework 2.0 that allows to run shared add-in? 4. Do you have any msm modules in your setup project? Regards from Belarus, Eugene E. Starostin --- A .NET steroid for developing add-ins and smart tags for Microsoft Office - http://www.add-in-express.com "Rog" <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:u978rdeSGHA.5728[ at ]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... [Quoted Text] >I developed my addin in Visual Studio 2003 using .net 1.1, now when I try >to run my addin on a machine that has .net 2.0 it does not load and in fact >the load behavior changes from 3 to 2 even though it works fine on a >machine with .net 1.1 installed. > Any ideas? > Thanks

Re: .net 2.0 problems Rog <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> 3/17/2006 5:43:37 PM have not installed the .net 2.0 framework hotfix. Can you point me to the url for this? Thank you very much for your help. Eugene E. Starostin wrote: [Quoted Text] > Hello, > > > 1. Are there other add-ins developed on .net framework 2.0 installed on > this machine? > 2. Have you cheked your add-in in the disabled items? > 3. Have you installed the hotfix for framework 2.0 that allows to run > shared add-in? > 4. Do you have any msm modules in your setup project? > > > Regards from Belarus, > Eugene E. Starostin > --- > > A .NET steroid for developing add-ins and smart tags for Microsoft > Office - http://www.add-in-express.com > > > > "Rog" <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:u978rdeSGHA.5728[ at ]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... >> I developed my addin in Visual Studio 2003 using .net 1.1, now when I >> try to run my addin on a machine that has .net 2.0 it does not load >> and in fact the load behavior changes from 3 to 2 even though it works >> fine on a machine with .net 1.1 installed. >> Any ideas? >> Thanks >

Re: .net 2.0 problems "Eugene E. Starostin" <eestar[ at ]afalinasoft.com> 3/17/2006 5:54:50 PM Rog, You need to install the following updates for MS Office and Visual Studio ..NET 2005 (if you have installed on this machine). http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1B0BFB35-C252-43CC-8A2A-6A64D6AC4670&displaylang=en http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908002 -- Regards from Belarus, Eugene E. Starostin --- http://www.add-in-express.com A .NET steroid for developing add-ins and smart tags for Microsoft Office "Rog" <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:OcgPapeSGHA.4740[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... [Quoted Text] > have not installed the .net 2.0 framework hotfix. > Can you point me to the url for this? > Thank you very much for your help. > > Eugene E. Starostin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> 1. Are there other add-ins developed on .net framework 2.0 installed on >> this machine? >> 2. Have you cheked your add-in in the disabled items? >> 3. Have you installed the hotfix for framework 2.0 that allows to run >> shared add-in? >> 4. Do you have any msm modules in your setup project? >> >> >> Regards from Belarus, >> Eugene E. Starostin >> --- >> >> A .NET steroid for developing add-ins and smart tags for Microsoft >> Office - http://www.add-in-express.com >> >> >> >> "Rog" <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:u978rdeSGHA.5728[ at ]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... >>> I developed my addin in Visual Studio 2003 using .net 1.1, now when I >>> try to run my addin on a machine that has .net 2.0 it does not load and >>> in fact the load behavior changes from 3 to 2 even though it works fine >>> on a machine with .net 1.1 installed. >>> Any ideas? >>> Thanks >>

Re: .net 2.0 problems Rog <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> 3/28/2006 5:31:51 PM So I tool my project from VS 2003 and opened it in VS 2005. Installed these updates, but it does not seem to help. As a side note, I am using a Shim in order to load my add-in. Is this a problem. Each time I start Outlook the Loadbehavior gets reset from 3 to 2. Any ideas? Rog Eugene E. Starostin wrote: [Quoted Text] > Rog, > > You need to install the following updates for MS Office and Visual > Studio .NET 2005 (if you have installed on this machine). > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1B0BFB35-C252-43CC-8A2A-6A64D6AC4670&displaylang=en > > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908002 > > >

Re: .net 2.0 problems rogsmith[ at ]gmail.com 4/3/2006 1:33:57 PM That is a good question, but yes it was installed on this machine. If you want to make your add-in totally compatible with .NET 2.0 can you still use a SHIM what more do you need to do ? Rog sublimese wrote: [Quoted Text] > This might be a stupid question, but is the .NET framework 1.1 > installed on the machine you are trying to get this to work on? > (It seems like most of time when I am trying to figure out why > something isn't working for me, its something totally obvious and > simple, and thus I always overlook it until I have spent hours and > hours trying to figure it out).

Re: .net 2.0 problems Rog <rog_21[ at ]yahoo.com> 4/4/2006 3:52:19 PM I solved this problem. I have posted my steps here: http://blog.alkirasoftware.com/?p=14 Thanks, Rog rogsmith[ at ]gmail.com wrote: [Quoted Text] > That is a good question, but yes it was installed on this machine. > If you want to make your add-in totally compatible with .NET 2.0 can > you still use a SHIM what more do you need to do ? > Rog > > sublimese wrote: >> This might be a stupid question, but is the .NET framework 1.1 >> installed on the machine you are trying to get this to work on? >> (It seems like most of time when I am trying to figure out why >> something isn't working for me, its something totally obvious and >> simple, and thus I always overlook it until I have spent hours and >> hours trying to figure it out). >