> Brian I'd have to agree with Steve on many accounts
> (First your first post was cryptic at best.)
>
> But RWW will do what you want, with No Additional IP
>
> However, what you'd want to do is not possible unless you'd change the RDC
> Port of either the SBS or the Terminal Server.
> (In your cause the SBS would be the lesser of the evils say 3390) Then you'd
> have to Push that port 3389 through the SBS to the Terminal Server
>
> All this requires some custom configuration.
> and using RWW is nearly ZERO configuration and it works.
>
> Just add TS server in the SBS
> And use
http://server/connectcomputer on the TS server and it's done.
>
> When they Connect Via RWW they can connect to the TS server.
> (Then you don't have to do all that extra non standard configuration.)
>
> Russ
>
> --
>
> Russell Grover
> SBITS.Biz
> Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist.
> MCP, MCPS, MCNPS, (MCP-SBS)
> support [ at ] SBITS.Biz
> Remote SBS2003 Support
>
http://www.SBITS.Biz>
>
> "Steve" <newsgroup[ at ]public.lan> wrote in message
> news:uurxwdRuHHA.3404[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> > Why can't you use a standard RWW setup which allows the outside access to
> > see both the SBS and the terminal server? I'm not sure how having 2 public
> > IPs will help you with this.
> >
> > "BrianMultiLanguage" <BrianMultiLanguage[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> > in message news:7C88B7A6-A86F-4338-A184-BF4D2E1A169D[ at ]microsoft.com...
> >> Allow outside access to the terminal server(not SBS) while still
> >> manitaining
> >> remote admin access to the SBS server based on the configuration below.
> >>
> >> I have my dual nic'd sbs2003, 10.x.x.x inside(LAN), 172.x.x.x
> >> (INTERNET)to
> >> my router.
> >> Two outside ips on the router, public_ip1 and public_ip2.
> >> The terminal server is at 10.x.x.8.
> >> The 10.x.x.x network(all computers) gateway to the sbs2003 including the
> >> terminal server.
> >> Thanks Steve, I hope that is clear.
> >>
> >> "Steve" wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think the response is something other than a yes or no. Your question
> >>> (s)
> >>> are very unclear so I suggest you try a bit more detail as to what you
> >>> need
> >>> to know or are attempting to do.
> >>>
> >>> "BrianMultiLanguage" <BrianMultiLanguage[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com>
> >>> wrote in
> >>> message news:0CE349AA-ACD4-4E7A-91E5-BFB88A7C6EAB[ at ]microsoft.com...
> >>> > Is that a yes or a no?
> >>> >
> >>> > "Michael Gossett" wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Wtf?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> "BrianMultiLanguage" <BrianMultiLanguage[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com>
> >>> >> wrote
> >>> >> in
> >>> >> message news:710A6A45-E00D-4EDC-9DE4-4482B4DB1996[ at ]microsoft.com...
> >>> >> >I have my dual nic'd sbs2003, 10.x.x.x inside, 172.x.x.x to my
> >>> >> >router.
> >>> >> >Two
> >>> >> > ouside ips on the router. A terminal server at 10.x.x.8. The
> >>> >> > 10.x.x.x
> >>> >> > network
> >>> >> > gateways to the sbs2003 including the terminal server. See where I
> >>> >> > am
> >>> >> > going?
> >>> >> > Oh I know.
> >>> >> > Change the rdp ports of the terminal server leaving the standard
> >>> >> > (or
> >>> >> > vice
> >>> >> > versa) ports to the sbs2003 via the router.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Right? woowho!
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>
>