Group:  English: Windows Vista ยป microsoft.public.windows.vista.file_management
Thread: Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points

DotNetBag
.NET Development Newsgroups

HTVi
TV Discussion Newsgroups

Our Hot Pick: Rising Antivirus 2006 - Certified by TUV & Checkmark! Get 10% discount by entering this coupon code: ONDISCOUNT10
Rising Antivirus 2006

Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points
DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam[ at ]crazyhat.net> 12.07.2007 22:39:13
I've noticed what appears to be an interesting quirk with shadow copies.
It looks like Vista bases shadow copies on a "maximum space" rather then
on a guaranteed minimum available space basis.

While reasonable on the surface, there is one problem with this
implementation. If you create a file larger then your shadow copy's
maximum size, delete it, then recreate the file (potentially a few
times), the effective result is that all shadow copies are lost even
though there may be enough space for the cumulative changes to be stored
on the volume in question.

Is my interpretation of this situation correct? If so, is there any way
to change how Vista acts? I would be quite happy for Vista to simply
guarantee me a minimum of 10GB of available space on each logical
partition, deleting shadow copies as needed when approaching the limit,
rather them limiting shadow copies to a fixed total amount of space.

I have run into this situation in the real world when working with 4.7GB
file sets which were compressed and split into smaller parts for
transmission. Despite having a 400GB drive, with over 100GB free at all
times, I ended up with no shadow copies / restore points when I ended up
needing to recover an unrelated file (luckily my file servers all
generate shadow copies too, so I was able to recover the file)

--
If quitters never win, and winners never quit,
what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"?
Re: Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points
"Robert Blacher" <rblacher[ at ]community.nospam> 13.07.2007 08:41:50
Windows Vista reserves 15% of your hard drive(s) for shadow copies, by
default.

You can change this with the "vssadmin" command. If you have problems with
the syntax, yell for help.

"DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam[ at ]crazyhat.net> wrote in message
news:4uad931i9cfrqdfoknu8qca3uoeh80bep9[ at ]4ax.com...
[Quoted Text]
> I've noticed what appears to be an interesting quirk with shadow copies.
> It looks like Vista bases shadow copies on a "maximum space" rather then
> on a guaranteed minimum available space basis.
>
> While reasonable on the surface, there is one problem with this
> implementation. If you create a file larger then your shadow copy's
> maximum size, delete it, then recreate the file (potentially a few
> times), the effective result is that all shadow copies are lost even
> though there may be enough space for the cumulative changes to be stored
> on the volume in question.
>
> Is my interpretation of this situation correct? If so, is there any way
> to change how Vista acts? I would be quite happy for Vista to simply
> guarantee me a minimum of 10GB of available space on each logical
> partition, deleting shadow copies as needed when approaching the limit,
> rather them limiting shadow copies to a fixed total amount of space.
>
> I have run into this situation in the real world when working with 4.7GB
> file sets which were compressed and split into smaller parts for
> transmission. Despite having a 400GB drive, with over 100GB free at all
> times, I ended up with no shadow copies / restore points when I ended up
> needing to recover an unrelated file (luckily my file servers all
> generate shadow copies too, so I was able to recover the file)
>
> --
> If quitters never win, and winners never quit,
> what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"?

Home | Search | Terms | Imprint | Contact
Newsgroups Reader - provided by WiredBox.Net