Thanks for the clarification. It was hard for us to distinguish between the
two approaches as "outsiders." I guess that also explains the "view only"
functionality a little better.
Either way, we love it and recommend it to others that have seen it and like
what it delivers.
=D-
"James Woodall" <JamesWoodall[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4C24C35E-A131-4B09-B942-D8FF4CE5EC84[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > Derek,
>
> The Momento implementation that we made at i-mate does not run on the
> Micro
> Framework. It is actually just a C# implementation written using the .NET
> Compact Framework and since we were only parsing glance content the job
> was
> made much easier.
>
> "Derek R. Flickinger" wrote:
>
>> We use the 10" (Model 100) version. It does a really nice job as a
>> "read-only" Windows SideShow rendering device (it does not send
>> navigation
>> or commands back to the Windows SideShow Gadget running on the host
>> computer). However, note that it only displays one Windows SideShow
>> Gadget's information at a time (a two to three line display). There is a
>> delay between updates on the screen, bit it keeps up pretty well. Also
>> note
>> that this product is based on the Windows .NET Micro Framework running on
>> Windows CE. They have done a really nice job on the implementation. We
>> highly recommend it.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> =D-
>>
>> Derek R. Flickinger
>> Interactive Homes, Inc.
>>
>> "Ian" <dimension.three[ at ]virgin.net.donotspam> wrote in message
>> news:53D8CBC1-AB15-41DC-B189-8A024781576A[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> > Anyone have one of these and care to share their thoughts?
>>
|