> It's not a third party control: it's built into Windows. That's what APIs
> are all about.
>
> All OCX controls are are wrappers around the APIs. However, due to how OCXs
> are built, they're prone to versioning problems. Calling the APIs yourself
> can minimize such problems.
>
> --
> Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
>
http://I.Am/DougSteele> (no e-mails, please!)
>
>
>
> "KMP" <KMP[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:770C97D8-C5F3-46F6-83F8-A64F2A659F3F[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > Thanks for your prompt reply.
> > I know this is one of the available options - but is there any way I can
> > get
> > the current calendar control to work. My problem with using a third party
> > control/code is that I will have to keep checking for updates and I am not
> > sure about the kind of support I will get. Please enlighten me if these
> > are
> > some things that don't need attention. Thank you.
> >
> > "Douglas J. Steele" wrote:
> >
> >> While admittedly a bit of work to retrofit, do yourself a favour and
> >> scrap
> >> the calendar control and use the all-API approach Stephen Lebans has at
> >>
http://www.lebans.com/monthcalendar.htm> >>
> >> --
> >> Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
> >>
http://I.Am/DougSteele> >> (no e-mails, please!)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "KMP" <KMP[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:B803B3E5-73D9-498C-90A0-B421EDC3639C[ at ]microsoft.com...
> >> >I have a calendar control in Access 2002 applications that works fine.
> >> >When
> >> > we ported all the Access 2002 applications to 2003, the calendar
> >> > control
> >> > stopped working at most of the places where it is called. I checked for
> >> > missing references and the version numbers too - they all seem to be
> >> > correct.
> >> > The control works sometimes which surprises me.
> >> >
> >> > Also, when our setup application loads the MDEs on production servers,
> >> > the
> >> > problem seems to come up. But when each application is individually
> >> > loaded
> >> > on
> >> > a production server, the problem does not come up.
> >> >
> >> > The only difference between the Access 2002 and 2003 versions are that
> >> > the
> >> > 2003 version applications have been digitally signed. I am wondering if
> >> > that
> >> > has anything to do with this issue. If that is the case, then why does
> >> > it
> >> > work at some places?
> >> >
> >> > Any help will be appreciated. Please let me know if you need more
> >> > information. Thanks.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>