Group:  Microsoft Outlook ยป microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Thread: Outlook security

DotNetBag
.NET Development Newsgroups

HTVi
TV Discussion Newsgroups

Our Hot Pick: Rising Antivirus 2006 - Certified by TUV & Checkmark! Get 10% discount by entering this coupon code: ONDISCOUNT10
Rising Antivirus 2006

Outlook security
James 29.09.2006 19:56:02
You have ruined Outlook by being overly security conscious and preventing MDB
files from being emailed.

You have reuined Outlook by not allowing short cuts to be inserted into the
text body of Tasks.

It is pretty clear that your staff does not use Outlook. I wonder what
contact management program they use. I would like to switch.

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=318ddb42-d6d8-4906-8553-0496a38e6c95&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Re: Outlook security
"William Lefkovics [MVP]" <william[ at ]spamsux.lefkovics.net> 30.09.2006 00:26:00
I love sassy posts! Good on ya, mate.

But still, they are damned if they do, and damned if they don't right? In
this case, these are just defaults that savvy users can override.

I suspect many of the Microsoft folks are using Outlook 2007 by now. They
may have one VP *cough*ozzie*cough* using Lotus Notes....


"James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:318DDB42-D6D8-4906-8553-0496A38E6C95[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text]
> You have ruined Outlook by being overly security conscious and preventing
> MDB
> files from being emailed.
>
> You have reuined Outlook by not allowing short cuts to be inserted into
> the
> text body of Tasks.
>
> It is pretty clear that your staff does not use Outlook. I wonder what
> contact management program they use. I would like to switch.
>
> ----------------
> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
> this
> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=318ddb42-d6d8-4906-8553-0496a38e6c95&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts

Re: Outlook security
James 30.09.2006 00:44:01
William,

I understand what you are saying.

That is their position.

However, they could leave a configuration option fo the end user. There is
no excuse for making that security decision for me.

At least that is the way I think.

"William Lefkovics [MVP]" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> I love sassy posts! Good on ya, mate.
>
> But still, they are damned if they do, and damned if they don't right? In
> this case, these are just defaults that savvy users can override.
>
> I suspect many of the Microsoft folks are using Outlook 2007 by now. They
> may have one VP *cough*ozzie*cough* using Lotus Notes....
>
>
> "James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:318DDB42-D6D8-4906-8553-0496A38E6C95[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > You have ruined Outlook by being overly security conscious and preventing
> > MDB
> > files from being emailed.
> >
> > You have reuined Outlook by not allowing short cuts to be inserted into
> > the
> > text body of Tasks.
> >
> > It is pretty clear that your staff does not use Outlook. I wonder what
> > contact management program they use. I would like to switch.
> >
> > ----------------
> > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
> > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
> > this
> > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
> > click "I Agree" in the message pane.
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=318ddb42-d6d8-4906-8553-0496a38e6c95&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
>
Re: Outlook security
"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" <outlookmvp[ at ]msn.com> 30.09.2006 03:51:36
besides the fact that you can send the blocked file types, you can also
unblock them.
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm#attsec - many addins will make
the changes for you, so no need to edit the registry yourself.



--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/

Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST[ at ]PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM


"James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E39A69DD-F185-4B96-9E02-0C719D4D4B47[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text]
> William,
>
> I understand what you are saying.
>
> That is their position.
>
> However, they could leave a configuration option fo the end user. There
> is
> no excuse for making that security decision for me.
>
> At least that is the way I think.
>
> "William Lefkovics [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> I love sassy posts! Good on ya, mate.
>>
>> But still, they are damned if they do, and damned if they don't right?
>> In
>> this case, these are just defaults that savvy users can override.
>>
>> I suspect many of the Microsoft folks are using Outlook 2007 by now.
>> They
>> may have one VP *cough*ozzie*cough* using Lotus Notes....
>>
>>
>> "James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:318DDB42-D6D8-4906-8553-0496A38E6C95[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> > You have ruined Outlook by being overly security conscious and
>> > preventing
>> > MDB
>> > files from being emailed.
>> >
>> > You have reuined Outlook by not allowing short cuts to be inserted into
>> > the
>> > text body of Tasks.
>> >
>> > It is pretty clear that your staff does not use Outlook. I wonder what
>> > contact management program they use. I would like to switch.
>> >
>> > ----------------
>> > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
>> > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the
>> > "I
>> > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
>> > this
>> > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and
>> > then
>> > click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>> >
>> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=318ddb42-d6d8-4906-8553-0496a38e6c95&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
>>


Re: Outlook security
James 30.09.2006 06:02:01
Diane,

Thanks.

I will give this a try.


"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> besides the fact that you can send the blocked file types, you can also
> unblock them.
> http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm#attsec - many addins will make
> the changes for you, so no need to edit the registry yourself.
>
>
>
> --
> Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
> Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
> Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
> Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
> Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
>
> Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
> Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
> Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
> EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST[ at ]PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
>
>
> "James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:E39A69DD-F185-4B96-9E02-0C719D4D4B47[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > William,
> >
> > I understand what you are saying.
> >
> > That is their position.
> >
> > However, they could leave a configuration option fo the end user. There
> > is
> > no excuse for making that security decision for me.
> >
> > At least that is the way I think.
> >
> > "William Lefkovics [MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> I love sassy posts! Good on ya, mate.
> >>
> >> But still, they are damned if they do, and damned if they don't right?
> >> In
> >> this case, these are just defaults that savvy users can override.
> >>
> >> I suspect many of the Microsoft folks are using Outlook 2007 by now.
> >> They
> >> may have one VP *cough*ozzie*cough* using Lotus Notes....
> >>
> >>
> >> "James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:318DDB42-D6D8-4906-8553-0496A38E6C95[ at ]microsoft.com...
> >> > You have ruined Outlook by being overly security conscious and
> >> > preventing
> >> > MDB
> >> > files from being emailed.
> >> >
> >> > You have reuined Outlook by not allowing short cuts to be inserted into
> >> > the
> >> > text body of Tasks.
> >> >
> >> > It is pretty clear that your staff does not use Outlook. I wonder what
> >> > contact management program they use. I would like to switch.
> >> >
> >> > ----------------
> >> > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> >> > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the
> >> > "I
> >> > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
> >> > this
> >> > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and
> >> > then
> >> > click "I Agree" in the message pane.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=318ddb42-d6d8-4906-8553-0496a38e6c95&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
> >>
>
>
>
Re: Outlook security
James 01.10.2006 00:24:01
Diane,

Thank you for the suggestion.

I was able to solve the problem by following the link.

The other issue I have is inserting File Links and Folder Links in the text
body of Tasks. I used that extensively with earlier verisons of Outlook to
save time in locating files needed for projects.

Our "big brothers" at MS Outlook have "protected" me from myself once again
by disabling that function.

Do you have suggestions about how to patch or work around this design by MS
Outlook team.

Sincerely,

Jim

"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote:

[Quoted Text]
> besides the fact that you can send the blocked file types, you can also
> unblock them.
> http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm#attsec - many addins will make
> the changes for you, so no need to edit the registry yourself.
>
>
>
> --
> Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
> Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
> Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
> Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
> Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
>
> Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
> Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
> Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
> EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST[ at ]PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
>
>
> "James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:E39A69DD-F185-4B96-9E02-0C719D4D4B47[ at ]microsoft.com...
> > William,
> >
> > I understand what you are saying.
> >
> > That is their position.
> >
> > However, they could leave a configuration option fo the end user. There
> > is
> > no excuse for making that security decision for me.
> >
> > At least that is the way I think.
> >
> > "William Lefkovics [MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> I love sassy posts! Good on ya, mate.
> >>
> >> But still, they are damned if they do, and damned if they don't right?
> >> In
> >> this case, these are just defaults that savvy users can override.
> >>
> >> I suspect many of the Microsoft folks are using Outlook 2007 by now.
> >> They
> >> may have one VP *cough*ozzie*cough* using Lotus Notes....
> >>
> >>
> >> "James" <James[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:318DDB42-D6D8-4906-8553-0496A38E6C95[ at ]microsoft.com...
> >> > You have ruined Outlook by being overly security conscious and
> >> > preventing
> >> > MDB
> >> > files from being emailed.
> >> >
> >> > You have reuined Outlook by not allowing short cuts to be inserted into
> >> > the
> >> > text body of Tasks.
> >> >
> >> > It is pretty clear that your staff does not use Outlook. I wonder what
> >> > contact management program they use. I would like to switch.
> >> >
> >> > ----------------
> >> > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> >> > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the
> >> > "I
> >> > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
> >> > this
> >> > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and
> >> > then
> >> > click "I Agree" in the message pane.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=318ddb42-d6d8-4906-8553-0496a38e6c95&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
> >>
>
>
>

Home | Search | Terms | Imprint | Contact
Newsgroups Reader - provided by WiredBox.Net