yupp. we do ('97) 2003 seems to hold up though (yet)
;-) pieter
"Ken Snell (MVP)" <kthsneisllis9[ at ]ncoomcastt.renaetl> wrote in message news:OuDanUN5GHA.2464[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
[Quoted Text] > .mdb is the standard file extension for ACCESS files. All versions of > ACCESS will be able to open the file unless the file was created in the > format of a later version than the one you're using. You'll be told that > by your ACCESS software, if it's the case, when you try to open the file. > > ACCESS 2003 is the latest version and is a good release. ACCESS 2002 also > good; ACCESS 2000 is buggy; ACCESS 97 is the "standard" among many ACCESS > developers (they really like it!). ACCESS 2007 is still in beta version. > > -- > > Ken Snell > <MS ACCESS MVP> > > "Gray wolf" <Graywolf[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:8B1B3EEB-621F-462A-8D8F-9B099037450B[ at ]microsoft.com... >>I noticed there are many different types of MS Access, I am trying to read >> discs that are mdb. Which version is best for me? > >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 4868 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now!
|