Synchronizing both Direct and Indirect "rg" <rg01[ at ]goodnews.net> 19.09.2006 20:16:04 Have a situation where the network works well for ~90% of users with DIRECT synchronization. Several other users will need to use INDIRECT synchronization due to their connectivity issues. Both of these user groups will access the same replica for synchronization. DIRECT synchronization works well. Any suggestions with combining this with INDIRECT synchronization? In addition, is there a document that would walk one through configuring workstations/servers for INDIRECT synchronization? Regards.

Re: Synchronizing both Direct and Indirect "David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet[ at ]dfenton.com.invalid> 19.09.2006 23:07:46 "rg" <rg01[ at ]goodnews.net> wrote in news:ugqGzhC3GHA.4976[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: [Quoted Text] > Have a situation where the network works well for ~90% of users > with DIRECT synchronization. > > Several other users will need to use INDIRECT synchronization due > to their connectivity issues. Both of these user groups will > access the same replica for synchronization. As long as this replica is not being used for editing on a LAN and is not the Design Master, it should be OK. > DIRECT synchronization works well. Any suggestions with > combining this with INDIRECT synchronization? There's no issue, so far as I can see. Why would there be? > In addition, is there a document that would walk one through > configuring workstations/servers for INDIRECT synchronization? What part of the white paper is unclear about it? -- David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/