Thanks, that's what I thought.
I'm just going to create a new db to store new data.
My needs for the historical data are limited at this point.
Thanks,
Dave -- Brevity is the soul of wit.
"Graham R Seach" wrote:
[Quoted Text] > Dave, > > Access 97 and earlier had a 1GB file size limit, whereas Access 2000 onwards > have a 2GB limit. You can get some instability, depending on the transaction > rate, beyond about 1.5-1.8GB. You can overcome this by splitting the > database (code and forms etc in one file, and data in another). You can even > split the database so that you have many files containing different tables. > > Normalising will help to reduce file size by eliminating redundant data. > > Regards, > Graham R Seach > Microsoft Access MVP > Sydney, Australia > --------------------------- > > "Dave F" <DaveF[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:457F668B-4DE6-4305-8A64-9AC2EA47CBFF[ at ]microsoft.com... > > Hi, > > > > Two related questions. > > > > 1) I have a non-normalized Access database which is just a very large data > > table, to which I add about 100,000 rows each month. This db is currently > > about 1 gb in size. How large can the db become before it becomes > > unstable? > > > > 2) Would taking the time to normalize this db reduce its size? > > > > > > -- > > Brevity is the soul of wit. > > >
|