In article <e7Jifl3oGHA.4188[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, taesler[ at ]gmx.de says...
[Quoted Text] > > Yuck, please not! Those Adobe add-ins are horribly written and a > > major pain. > > Really? > It's one of the most used features on my side. > Would not know how to work without (because I need more than just a > *printer*). > How else can one get ineratcive documents having links to the > fottnotes and from the TOC to the respective chapter? On how get > interactive URLs in the PDF?
Well, you could get the full version of Acrobat and add them in by hand. But then, who wants to go back through an acrobat file and redo all the work they had previously done in the original document.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Adobe add-ins didn't work right because Microsoft doesn't want them to work right. It is amazing how many products stop working well just before Microsoft starts marketing a competing product.
|