> There is a lot of bugs that have been corrected between the ADP 2000 and
> the 2002 version and a few bugs between 2002 and 2003.
>
> There is still a number of bugs that remains in the A2003 version;
> however, if you are serious about ADP, you should definitely forget about
> A2000 and probably about A2002, too.
>
> --
> Sylvain Lafontaine, ing.
> MVP - Technologies Virtual-PC
> E-mail:
http://cerbermail.com/?QugbLEWINF>
>
> "Rob Hofkens" <rob[ at ]marmerindustrie.nl> wrote in message
> news:440bed05$0$11067$e4fe514c[ at ]news.xs4all.nl...
>> First thing I did this morning was installing SP3 for MS Office 2000.
>> And the problem is solved..yay.
>> But I got a warning message that not all functions are supported in
>> Access 2000 with SQL 2000.
>> So maybe Access 2003 is better in that respect ?
>>
>> Thank you very much !
>>
>> Rob.
>>
>>
>> "Rob Hofkens" <robhofkens[ at ]xs4all.nl> schreef in bericht
>> news:440b53fd$0$11079$e4fe514c[ at ]news.xs4all.nl...
>>> Hi Aaron !
>>>
>>> Thanx for answering my question :)
>>> I have local admin rights but don't have any office packs installed.
>>> I am shocked to hear that the regular Access 2000 and SQL 2000 ain't
>>> compatible :(
>>> I could try Access 2003 since I have one copy available.
>>> Or is installing the office 2000 service pack(s) sufficiant ?
>>>
>>> Rob.
>>>
>>> <aaron.kempf[ at ]gmail.com> schreef in bericht
>>> news:1141494000.312056.210000[ at ]z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>>> are you a local admin on the machine? by default you would have
>>>> permissions.
>>>>
>>>> do you have office service packs?
>>>>
>>>> i reccomend anything other than Access 2000; i mean some idiot in
>>>> redmond decided to make Access 2000 and SQL 2000 not compatable.
>>>>
>>>> -Aaron
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>