Group:  Microsoft Access ยป microsoft.public.access.odbcclientsvr
Thread: Access to Visual FoxPro - ODBC vs OLE DB

DotNetBag
.NET Development Newsgroups

HTVi
TV Discussion Newsgroups

Our Hot Pick: Rising Antivirus 2006 - Certified by TUV & Checkmark! Get 10% discount by entering this coupon code: ONDISCOUNT10
Rising Antivirus 2006

Access to Visual FoxPro - ODBC vs OLE DB
JudyG. 24.10.2005 16:15:03
Can someone give me the differences and/or reasons of using the ODBC vs OLE
DB connection between Access 2003 and Visual FoxPro database? I'm using ODBC
right now, but the speed is terrible. Someone asked about OLE DB. I'm just
starting the research but am not quite sure of the differences. Thanks in
advance...
Re: Access to Visual FoxPro - ODBC vs OLE DB
"Joe Fallon" <jfallon1[ at ]nospamtwcny.rr.com> 27.10.2005 23:56:15
Access 2000 and later use ODBC to talk to Foxpro.
http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb;en-us;824264&spid=2509&sid=50

Older versions of Access (97 and back) were able to talk directly to Foxpro
using the ISAM driver.
I think this was the fastest method. Not sure why they changed it.

OLE DB is used in ADO and ADO.Net.

Bottom line - use ODBC.
--
Joe Fallon




"JudyG." <JudyG.[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1C1F7D41-58F4-447A-98CF-14AAA49ED648[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text]
> Can someone give me the differences and/or reasons of using the ODBC vs
> OLE
> DB connection between Access 2003 and Visual FoxPro database? I'm using
> ODBC
> right now, but the speed is terrible. Someone asked about OLE DB. I'm
> just
> starting the research but am not quite sure of the differences. Thanks in
> advance...


Home | Search | Terms | Imprint | Contact
Newsgroups Reader - provided by WiredBox.Net