|
|
Our Hot Pick: Rising Antivirus 2006 - Certified by TUV & Checkmark! Get 10% discount by entering this coupon code: ONDISCOUNT10
Installed Office 97 Pro with service packs on a newly installed WXP Pro system 3rd quarter 2005. Installed Access 97 application at that time and it operated successfully until late 4th quarter 2005. I'm curious about the versions of the core support requirements (MDAC, JET, DAO, etc) that WXP and Off97 require in order to operate successfully, because....
A function within the Access 97 application has begun to fail. The function involves displaying (rather, failure to display) information on a form for a newly selected data object from a list of data objects. Some objects display their data in the form successfully. ALL other computers accessing this database (W98 and WXP using Off97) operate successfully. I've uninstalled and reinstalled all Office and application components on this computer with no change in symptoms.
So, I wonder whether a support (base) component on the system in question has changed, become corrupted or even upgraded around the time of initial failure. I see no signs, and have no indication from the client, that there were any client-induced changes.
|
|
I suspect it has nothing to do specifically with the combination of Access 97/Windows XP, but simply the fact that your References collection has got messed up.
References problems can be caused by differences in either the location or file version of certain files between the machine where the application was developed, and where it's being run (or the file missing completely from the target machine). Such differences are common when new software is installed.
On the machine(s) where it's not working, open any code module (or open the Debug Window, using Ctrl-G, provided you haven't selected the "keep debug window on top" option). Select Tools | References from the menu bar. Examine all of the selected references.
If any of the selected references have "MISSING:" in front of them, unselect them, and back out of the dialog. If you really need the reference(s) you just unselected (you can tell by doing a Compile All Modules), go back in and reselect them.
If none have "MISSING:", select an additional reference at random, back out of the dialog, then go back in and unselect the reference you just added. If that doesn't solve the problem, try to unselect as many of the selected references as you can (Access may not let you unselect them all), back out of the dialog, then go back in and reselect the references you just unselected. (NOTE: write down what the references are before you delete them, because they'll be in a different order when you go back in)
For far more than you could ever want to know about this problem, check out http://www.accessmvp.com/djsteele/AccessReferenceErrors.html, or check my December, 2003 "Access Answers" column in Pinnacle Publication's "Smart Access" (you can download the column, and sample database, for free at http://www.accessmvp.com/DJSteele/SmartAccess.html)
-- Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP http://I.Am/DougSteele (no private e-mails, please)
"Mark[ at ]PCICS" <Mark[ at ]PCICS[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:23B39854-CDE5-48DB-9286-49B6D9B8C661[ at ]microsoft.com...
[Quoted Text] > Installed Office 97 Pro with service packs on a newly installed WXP Pro > system 3rd quarter 2005. Installed Access 97 application at that time and > it > operated successfully until late 4th quarter 2005. I'm curious about the > versions of the core support requirements (MDAC, JET, DAO, etc) that WXP > and > Off97 require in order to operate successfully, because.... > > A function within the Access 97 application has begun to fail. The > function > involves displaying (rather, failure to display) information on a form for > a > newly selected data object from a list of data objects. Some objects > display > their data in the form successfully. ALL other computers accessing this > database (W98 and WXP using Off97) operate successfully. I've uninstalled > and > reinstalled all Office and application components on this computer with no > change in symptoms. > > So, I wonder whether a support (base) component on the system in question > has changed, become corrupted or even upgraded around the time of initial > failure. I see no signs, and have no indication from the client, that > there > were any client-induced changes.
|
|
|